Damn, I'm pretty impressed, they have some really cool guitars coming up for this year. Check it out. www.bcrich.com
2007 B.C. Rich lineup
- Thread starter FretsAflame
- Start date
StefTD
Member
The Exotic Warlock looks really great, I would add a better humbucker (Dimebucker or custom made Häussel) with a good amount of output for the ultimate metal rhythm guitar (ok, Death Metal..).
The prob for me is that I wanted to stop buying "metal axes" but that Warlock is very very sexy.
Some of the new Mockingbirds are nice, too and I've seen Kahler Trems on those Kerry King Signatures, very interesting.
(damn, my English sucks, to much partying in the last 48 hours...)
The prob for me is that I wanted to stop buying "metal axes" but that Warlock is very very sexy.
Some of the new Mockingbirds are nice, too and I've seen Kahler Trems on those Kerry King Signatures, very interesting.
(damn, my English sucks, to much partying in the last 48 hours...)
Kazrog
Kazrog, Inc.
Meh, they still just don't get it. No guitars with EMGs besides the KK signature. I had a couple of NJ series guitars (Warlock and Virgin) from them that were god awful a couple of years ago. They wouldn't stay in tune, and they sounded muddy and distant through any amp, with any pickups I tried.
The only nice BC Rich guitars I've ever played are the expensive US customs, which are typically gaudy and overpriced. No thanks!
I'm just not into any of the body styles anymore either, very dated and cheesy. The WarBeast just adds insult to injury, as do their attempts at acoustics and hollowbody electrics. Did they hire a 13 year old to design their new body styles? Fuck, I'd play a Telecaster before I'd play a BC Rich these days...
On the positive side - at least they finally got a decent website designer!!
The only nice BC Rich guitars I've ever played are the expensive US customs, which are typically gaudy and overpriced. No thanks!
I'm just not into any of the body styles anymore either, very dated and cheesy. The WarBeast just adds insult to injury, as do their attempts at acoustics and hollowbody electrics. Did they hire a 13 year old to design their new body styles? Fuck, I'd play a Telecaster before I'd play a BC Rich these days...
On the positive side - at least they finally got a decent website designer!!
broken81
Used by Protools
Ive owned like 4 bc rich guitars and i hated every one of them 
uke:
They def need to step there game up to keep up with the competition and WTF no emg81 are they crazy look at the demand bc rich!!!!!!!!!!
They do look cool but id Rather have a butt ass ugly guitar that plays and sounds good honestly
uke: They def need to step there game up to keep up with the competition and WTF no emg81 are they crazy look at the demand bc rich!!!!!!!!!!
They do look cool but id Rather have a butt ass ugly guitar that plays and sounds good honestly
I personally have just been searching for a badass V guitar.
I really dig the looks of their NT Jr. V, especially with the headstock, but of course the electronics would have to go and I'd have to set it up correctly because no factory puts out guitars in proper setup.
But I feel ya all on the comments. I'm just gonna have to have my GC hookup stock one of the V's so I can see how it plays
Still have a feeling that I'll be buying an ESP Amott model though
I really dig the looks of their NT Jr. V, especially with the headstock, but of course the electronics would have to go and I'd have to set it up correctly because no factory puts out guitars in proper setup.
But I feel ya all on the comments. I'm just gonna have to have my GC hookup stock one of the V's so I can see how it plays
Still have a feeling that I'll be buying an ESP Amott model though
I hope I'm not the only one 
kaomao
Member
What you thin about this:
http://www.bcrich.com/mockingbird_st.html#
and this (cool price and it has ebony fretboard/mahogany body):
http://cgi.ebay.it/NEW-BC-RICH-MOCK...2QQihZ010QQcategoryZ33035QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
http://www.bcrich.com/mockingbird_st.html#
and this (cool price and it has ebony fretboard/mahogany body):
http://cgi.ebay.it/NEW-BC-RICH-MOCK...2QQihZ010QQcategoryZ33035QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
elmuchoescadawg
Member
Hmm smells like someone didnt want to upset Gibson for one songs worth of guitar!!!
The whole range are just horrible and cheesy. Never played a nice one ever
I don't know, I mean all you saying you hate them already, when you haven't even played them? You never know, maybe they changed something. Don't judge a book by it's cover 
Although, I do agree that in the past, BC Rich's have sucked. They're good low end guitars. And, until Schecter came along, they never really had anything to compete with in that area.
But if you were to pick up a 80's or even early 90's NJ BC Rich, I guarantee you, you would like it ALOT more than the newer ones. But anyway, not saying the new ones are good, just saying they might be better than you're assuming. I can't argue if you think the body shapes are cheesy, but to each his own. Some like them, some love them, some hate them. Same with every body style. At least they're taking a chance, and trying to be a bit different from everyone else.
Although, I do agree that in the past, BC Rich's have sucked. They're good low end guitars. And, until Schecter came along, they never really had anything to compete with in that area.
But if you were to pick up a 80's or even early 90's NJ BC Rich, I guarantee you, you would like it ALOT more than the newer ones. But anyway, not saying the new ones are good, just saying they might be better than you're assuming. I can't argue if you think the body shapes are cheesy, but to each his own. Some like them, some love them, some hate them. Same with every body style. At least they're taking a chance, and trying to be a bit different from everyone else.
Genius Gone Insane
http://www.¯\(°_o)/¯.com
That special X mockingbird is a good one. The shape is not quite my style but it both plays and sounds great.
Similar threads
