speed
Member
I join you in your lament.
The nature of man and whether we could even manage to live in a state with total freedom has been debated for 1000s of years. I'd probably go with no, sadly. You've got to weigh it up and decide whether having restrictions on some of your "freedoms" is worthwhile, providing it allows you relative liberty on the rest.
I'd say that's a reasonable position, but it has a huge problem in that it assumes the State to be healthy, efficient and benevolent (to say nothing of the troublesome words like Truth or Justice) in how it brings about Laws that may restrict, but ultimately allow one to be quite free. I don't personally think such a State exists, and I'm not convinced it ever could.
Its far too idealistic to believe in no laws; however, the proliferation of laws, rules, standardization etc, by contemporary culture, is just out of control. I too, know of no solution , nor am I optimistic of manking finding one. For now, I will grab a beer, and pop a movie into my dvd player, and try to forget about it all.