I'm too lazy to search the forum for comments on these. I'm thinking of purchasing a pair but first I'd like get some feedback for them...what are your opinions? Is there a better option for a similar price?
Genius Gone Insane said:Anyone else want to comment on the oktava MK012's?
Edit: and aren't there some fake ones out there as i recall?
Unicorn said:Yes, there are.
http://oktava.tula.net/fake/
And theses fakes seem to be sold at guitarcenter really cheap.
http://www.guitarcenter.com/products/dispDeals.cfm?sel=6
Maybe the recognized that they haven't bought originals.
NathanSoulfracture said:I used one on a hi-hat once, it made the hi-hat sound plastic, so we used a Rode NT1 instead, much better.
~BURNY~ said:To my ears, c1000's are thin sounding. I'll never use it again except on snare bottom maybe. I also tested it on an Hi-Hat. Just awful.
About se electronics and all the chinese budget -so called condenser- microphones (most likely comming from the same factory--- Studio projects, MXL, T-bone, behringer, newer Oktava's, M-audio and also AKG and Audio-technica bottom price range products), they all have the same issues: too much high frequencies that you may find nice while monitoring a single source (as I did) but almost impossible to fit in the mix.
Some Rode products are in the middle of the road between cheap chinese and professional products. Best choice on a budget imho.
My nt3's are somewhat harsh sounding but darker than se electronics.
I'll post an A/B test on OH if you want.
~BURNY~ said:Here you go:
http://s33.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=01V6DI84DXE1L0TRCTGXI8K09W
Rode NT3 vs SE 1A.
Only OH, no eq, XY, 44.1khz/24bit straight into firepod's preamps @44.1khz/24bit , really quick made, so it's far from perfection but still you can make your own opinion.
I love to do those kind of shit :Spin: