my employer is now telling me that I am responsible for paying the taxes of the "income" I recieve by using a company vehicle. They are saying this 'boosts' my annual income by $5000 a year and I will be paying taxes on that income.
How does that work, they need me to drive a truck so they can have me do service calls to pick up furniture....why is this considered income? I didn't ask for it, I consider part of the job I have to do and the 'equipment" they say I need to do the job. Right now I'm upset and definately will be doing some research on this. Anyone know some Fed. tax laws that could enlighten me?
Thanks for the help. Kristy
It's called imputed income and it's a modern concept developed by the IRS. Imputed means something you could have had but didn't get (i.e. car expenses you should have if you had to drive to work but do not).
The feds can not only tax income you receive but also potential income. It's based on the premise that you don't work hard for your living but that the government builds the foundation for you to make a living. Taxes are you "giving back" to the society which gave you the opportunity to afford such luxuries to begin with.
Your company provides you with transportation. If it weren't for that transportation provided by your company, you'd have to spend extra maintanence and fuel on your vehicle or perhaps even car payments that tally up to a certain ammount. They've determined its 5,000 dollars. Because you don't have to pay that 5,000 dollars, you owe it in taxes to the government. After all, it's not fair for you to have free transportation and you need to give back.
It doesn't stop there. If you own multiple properties and are not renting them out or living in them, you can be taxed on the imputed income you might receive if you were renting them. It doesn't matter if you actually rent the properties. The government collects taxes on imputed income.
A famous case of imputed taxation was about the guy who caught Barry Bond's record breaking home run. He was forced to sell his baseball. Why? Because if he didn't sell it, the feds were going tax him based on the imputed income he would receive if he decided to sell it.
If all this angers you, it should. Taking away imputed income taxation is lumped in with "tax cuts for the rich."
The Michael