Art or Porn?

[speed]

i am totally addicted to the soft gooey squishyness of naturally large boobs

Haha. Well my point being is whether attraction to said squishy members is preprogrammed into our mammalian brains, or cultural. I honestly dont know.

 

[The Bringer]

being atracted to breasts shouldn't count as a fetish because
genetically human females are supposed to have boobs big enough to dramatically change shape when you put on or take off a bra
anything smaller is a mutation or hormone inbalance of some kind

males have different fetishes than females, so while a foot fetish is the most common for males, it's the least common for females
i can only think of 2 female celebs with the foot fetish but i can't remember their names right now

Did it seem like I was saying that liking breasts was a fetish? Sorry if so. I didn't mean to come off like that. It is natural, not a fetish, to like breasts.

 

[Tongue_Ring]

It is natural, not a fetish, to like breasts.

that was my point
liking breasts is a visual or blind feel attraction, where as the foot fetish is a blind smell reaction to pheromone receptors inside the nose having a sexual response to the post-pubescent-gender-identifying-pheromones that eminate from the sweat glands in the feet, this is an odor smelled on a subconcious level (for most people) and is a totally different smell than what you're refering to when you say someone's feet smell bad. you'd smell the pheromone odor the strongest when the person's feet have just been thouroughly washed clean of sweat or anything else that would be making a person's feet smell "bad"

 

[PrincessHades]

I know I'm late to this, but simply liking breasts is not a fetish. However, liking breasts and nothing else, being aroused only by breasts, is debatable a fetish. Foot "fetishes" are usually not fetishes. They are technically partialisms, but they kind of go by the common name of foot fetish. I have a foot fetish, but I am aroused by vaginas as well, so it's a partialism in my case. I am not turned on by breasts, though. Nor am I turned on by butts. I'm sexually kind of strange. It is debatable whether breasts are part of natural sexual attraction. I think they are, as woman with bigger breasts are more likely to be able to produce more milk for babies, making them the desirable mate. I still do not like to reduce a woman to breast size, I don't feel that that is appropriate, as there are far more important characteristics, such as mental ones. Also, breast attraction kind of backfired in a way, as implants are being used by women to make them more desirable. So really, breasts don't mean anything.

Again, I know I'm late to this discussion, I just thought I would add to it anyway.

 

[OrionAncient]

I think anything created by the human mind, heart, or hands in this case, is still an art form. Porn gets a lot of bad rep, because you know, its porn. But nudity can be an art form as well. You can fap to anything in my opinion as you can very well find out by browsing all the fetishes out there.

But that being said, at a certain point, one must realize that anything is an art form, just as well as it can be labeled "porn". Sex is still a dirty word in many societies, and so is penis, vagina, even something as mundane as breasts. Blame it on society, or religion, it doesn't matter when you get to the point if you are asking is it Art, or Porn?

What it comes down to is either ignorance, or enlightenment.

 

[CiG]

A woman being violated by 8 irregularly oversized cocks and then swimming in semen afterwards is not comparable with the techniques of Ray Harryhausen.

 

[PrincessHades]

A woman being violated by 8 irregularly oversized cocks and then swimming in semen afterwards is not comparable with the techniques of Ray Harryhausen.

Technique? Technique!? Technique!!? Technique!!!???