Axe-Fx II vs Axe-Fx Ultra

Clark Kent

Member
Jan 23, 2011
1,425
0
36
Hey there! My bandmate just got his Axe-II rig together and we spent this day A/B'ing these two out. My honest opinion is that the Axe-II is more direct sounding out of the box. The pick attack is very fast and it feels more like a real amp. That does not mean either sounds better than the other though. Here's a video we made using the same amp models and cabinet model. Bare in mind that neither unit is performing at their best in this video.



Now... once you've seen that and thought what ever you thought about which has better modeling etc. take a listen to these two clips where the only difference is the modeling, dynamics and playing style. The Ultra was matched to have the same spectrum with the Axe-II:





... and tell me which one was first, Ultra or II?

FEEDBACK!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clip 1) I'm gonna say it's Axe 2 first.

Clip 2) Ultra then Axe 2

I don't know what else to say other than I think they both sound very good.

/prepares to be wrong

/has an ear infection :(
 
I prefer the first clip in both, and the II to the I in the video. The problem with this is the different played and guitar, though - his playing seems much more open and dynamic than yours which is more focused, midrange-specific, and tight.
 
Yeah exactly. Different guitars, pickups, players... so many variables... even if it was the same player with the same guitar it wouldn't be 100% comparable.

The units are in the same order in both clips. Cliff Chase (creator of Axe-Fx) answered this question on the Fractal Forum and he guessed wrong.
 
Yeah, it doesn't mean that one is better than the other. Ofcourse the II is better with it's features alone. You can make the Ultra sound "so close that even the creator can't tell the difference" so I guess we should all be happy. :)

I must say that the pick attack was a lot direct in the II though. So there will most likely be a feel difference.
 
Do you have any experience of the Axe Standard Clark?

I actually owned one of those for a year or so. The same exact amp modeling as the Ultra. Half the power of the Ultra but will enough for most tones for sure. You can't do any of those uber crazy things like violin or bagpipe tones but other than that it's pretty good.
 
So... you tone matched the Ultra to be the same as the Axe II ... ??

Not sure what this proves really...

If you can't hear a difference then it means that there isn't much of a difference in the dynamics, which would mean that you can get the same tones with both units, if not by other means then at least with matching tones.

Personally I feel that it's so close that I can't justify paying 1000€ to get the II.

why buy an AFX, if you can just EQ-match any tone using any vst modeller? ;)

sorry, couldn't resist ;)

Haha... here we go again. Although I match EQ a lot I've never stated anywhere that I'd use matched tones live. I very rarely use them in my recordings. It's merely for the situations where I do a session with a band where the guitarists have no clue about how a guitar should sound to fit a mix. I can give them various options that I can work with without having to reamp a dozen different versions.

Other than that I wouldn't use a vst modeler live. That and the versatility of the Axe-Fx is unbeatable. TH2 sounds good but it feels kind of weird in the vst environment since you'll always have some delay which always affects feel. This and a million other reasons... :)
 
If you can't hear a difference then it means that there isn't much of a difference in the dynamics, which would mean that you can get the same tones with both units, if not by other means then at least with matching tones.

But dynamics isn't something you solely experience with hearing; in the context of guitar playing, dynamics is far more closely related to your actual playing of the guitar than it is to hearing it. Asking people to judge differences in dynamics when it comes to amp sounds, purely by ear.. I dunno... misses the whole picture if you ask me.
 
But dynamics isn't something you solely experience with hearing; in the context of guitar playing, dynamics is far more closely related to your actual playing of the guitar than it is to hearing it. Asking people to judge differences in dynamics when it comes to amp sounds, purely by ear.. I dunno... misses the whole picture if you ask me.

Word. Especially highly distorted "dynamic".

Interesting test!
 
Sorry mate, I know, I was just being a dick:)

Yea I knew you were kidding. :)

But dynamics isn't something you solely experience with hearing; in the context of guitar playing, dynamics is far more closely related to your actual playing of the guitar than it is to hearing it. Asking people to judge differences in dynamics when it comes to amp sounds, purely by ear.. I dunno... misses the whole picture if you ask me.

Yes you are right. The Axe-II felt very quick... it actually felt even quicker than most real amps. I had the Orange Thunder 30 combo and it had this quick feel. Like the attack was immidiate with no delay at all. However I'm not sure if that is what dynamics are all about. I'd say the Axe-II has sharper transients so in that way higher fidelity but both units worked the same way when dropping the volume on the guitar. That seems to be the way most people "test" dynamics.

So the feel is very different on the units.