So I read a short little book a while ago called On Bullshit. It's written by Harry G. Frankfurt, the foremost philosopher at Princeton.
The main idea was the distinction between bullshitting and lying. Lying, Frankfurt argues, is to claim that you know the truth and state the opposite; bullshitting is to make no claim whatsoever on the truth and just say whatever will improve one's position.
No one has really written about bullshit before (that I know of), and we use the word all the time, and both lying and bullshitting are fairly salient in our culture, so knowledge of what they are is important. To me this distinction was enlightening, as I think it is in general a true distinction. What do y'all think? Did this voice a distinction that was already in your head, but is now concrete? Or do you disagree?
The main idea was the distinction between bullshitting and lying. Lying, Frankfurt argues, is to claim that you know the truth and state the opposite; bullshitting is to make no claim whatsoever on the truth and just say whatever will improve one's position.
No one has really written about bullshit before (that I know of), and we use the word all the time, and both lying and bullshitting are fairly salient in our culture, so knowledge of what they are is important. To me this distinction was enlightening, as I think it is in general a true distinction. What do y'all think? Did this voice a distinction that was already in your head, but is now concrete? Or do you disagree?