Hi
Last day I had a little debate about if it's better to have all songs (in my case 6-8 Songs) in one project file or if it's better to have one project per Songs.
After that, I'm very pro to his all in one approach but I'm not sure if I lost one point that could bring me in trouble.
(Btw: I know that there's already a similar thread about reaper, but it didn't answer my questions.
)
PRO:
-Same mix for all songs
-Faster, 'cause you don't have to open up every project if something changes.
CONTRA:
-Hassle with tempo maps?
-Getting all tracks + automation in one big file is a lot of work
-Performance issues (every song uses another VSTi synth you have to bring in one file) --> eats resources
----
Maybe templates is way, but I don't have the experience using them.
Another problem would be, that every projects looks a bit different.
One got a few tracks more for clean guitars, the other projects has only dist. guitars. Think that would be tricky using templates, or?
Thanks a lot, Markus.
Last day I had a little debate about if it's better to have all songs (in my case 6-8 Songs) in one project file or if it's better to have one project per Songs.
After that, I'm very pro to his all in one approach but I'm not sure if I lost one point that could bring me in trouble.
(Btw: I know that there's already a similar thread about reaper, but it didn't answer my questions.

PRO:
-Same mix for all songs
-Faster, 'cause you don't have to open up every project if something changes.
CONTRA:
-Hassle with tempo maps?
-Getting all tracks + automation in one big file is a lot of work
-Performance issues (every song uses another VSTi synth you have to bring in one file) --> eats resources
----
Maybe templates is way, but I don't have the experience using them.
Another problem would be, that every projects looks a bit different.
One got a few tracks more for clean guitars, the other projects has only dist. guitars. Think that would be tricky using templates, or?
Thanks a lot, Markus.