D6 and D112 kick samples.

[Loren Littlejohn]

This is from my other thread but I didn't want to post them their only because I do like how the D6 samples came out. But anyhow these are with the mic in the same spot (just inside the port pointed at the beater):

D112

D6

These are 24bit 48k wav files.

 

[lordcthulhu]

Nice, thanks. By the way, for everyone d/l-ing this, Doing "Save link as" directly from this page won't work in Firefox...you have to left-click to open it via the inbuilt QuickTime thing and then put "save it from source" (if you have QT pro).

 

[paladin shredder]

pretty big difference!

 

[Soundlurker]

Definitely. I'm glad I bought a d6, though I haven't used it yet.

 

[el-biczel]

d6 has tighter low end, and more modern sound. I like the scooped mids.
The d112 is warmer sounding and has less click in it, but still it's a great mic for some music geners.

But now I'm happy that I bought d6

 

[Loren Littlejohn]

See I mostly do Rock/Metal so that's why I had such a sour attitude at the difference. It was really just amazing to me how different these mics are.

I'm still keeping both though .

Oh and I forgot to say that these are not processed (although I'm sure you could figure that out )

 

[Ermz]

The D6 sound in this case seems so much more suited to most styles of music. The D112 is like hitting a wet blanket in this instance. Can be useful, for sure, but it needs a lot more fiddling around with than the D6.

Cheers for the comparison.