Doomsday: How BP Gulf disaster may have triggered a 'world-killing' event

Total bullshit.

If you want to be worried about something, be worried about Yellowstone.

Clarification from an opinion that has TRUE credibility.

Matt, SneapForum's very own scientist. :lol:

[/asskiss]

But agreed, Yellowstone's about, IIRC, 2000 years overdue to erupt. The whole park is a 'super'volcano..





Not trying to imply I believe all of these doomsday theories or anything (though Yellowstone's pretty legit..) Because they're just that. Theories. Just posting what I came across on the mightyfine interwebs :lol:

Also, inb4 2012 stupid fucking bullshit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


‎DECEMBER 2012 -- A SCIENTIFIC REALITY CHECK
(Written by Don Yeomans, NASA senior research scientist)

Nibiru, a purported large object headed toward Earth, simply put - does not exist. There is no credible evidence - telescopic or otherwise - for this object's existence. There is also no evidence of any kind for its gravitational affects upon bodies in our solar system.

I do however like the name Nibiru. If I ever get a pet goldflish (and I just may do that sometime in early 2013), Nibiru will be at the top of my list.

The Mayan calendar does not end in December 2012. Just as the calendar you have on your kitchen wall does not cease to exist after December 31, the Mayan calendar does not cease to exist on December 21, 2012. This date is the end of the Mayan long-count period, but then -- just as your calendar begins again on January 1 - another long-count period begins for the Mayan calendar.

There are no credible predictions for worrisome astronomical events in 2012. The activity of the sun is cyclical with a period of roughly 11 years and the time of the next solar maximum is predicted to occur in the period 2010 -- 2012. However, the Earth routinely experiences these periods of increased solar activity -- for eons - without worrisome effects. The Earth's magnetic field, which deflects charged particles from the sun, does reverse polarity on time scales of about 400,000 years but there is no evidence that a reversal, which takes thousands of years to occur, will begin in 2012. Even if this several thousand year-long magnetic field reversal were to begin, that would not affect the Earth's rotation nor would it affect the direction of the Earth's rotation axis ... only Superman can do that.

The only important gravitational tugs experienced by the Earth are due to the moon and sun. There are no planetary alignments in the next few decades, Earth will not cross the galactic plane in 2012, and even if these alignments were to occur, their effects on the Earth would be negligible. Each December the Earth and Sun align with the approximate center of the Milky Way Galaxy but that is an annual event of no consequence.

The predictions of doomsday or dramatic changes on December 21, 2012 are all false. Incorrect doomsday predictions have taken place several times in each of the past several centuries. Readers should bear in mind what Carl Sagan noted several years ago; "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

For any claims of disaster or dramatic changes in 2012, the burden of proof is on the people making these claims. Where is the science? Where is the evidence? There is none, and all the passionate, persistent and profitable assertions, whether they are made in books, movies, documentaries or over the Internet, cannot change that simple fact. There is no credible evidence for any of the assertions made in support of unusual events taking place in December 2012.

That's for the Dam Christians. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe it's all gonna kick off in 2012, but I do not yet know what form it's going to take. But I do however know that it won't be doomsday. "Dam Christians."
 
Total bullshit.

If you want to be worried about something, be worried about Yellowstone.

My house is about a one hour drive from yellowstone. If anything happens I'm immediately fucked.

Although a fallout 3 kind of scenario would be awesome.
 
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

I was just at a beach in Texas for a couple days. Fuck......
 
Y'know... the first time I heard all the 2012 stuff was Terence McKenna, and he gave it a fairly positive spin. Saying it could be a technological event, the invention of time travel for instance.

Then six years later I start seeing all the doomsday bullshit. When originally I knew it as a fairly positive but ultimately fantastical idea in the mind of some hippies ... and it's now taken on a disturbing edge.
 
Y'know... the first time I heard all the 2012 stuff was Terence McKenna, and he gave it a fairly positive spin. Saying it could be a technological event, the invention of time travel for instance.

Then six years later I start seeing all the doomsday bullshit. When originally I knew it as a fairly positive but ultimately fantastical idea in the mind of some hippies ... and it's now taken on a disturbing edge.

Ditto. It was all sunshine and lollipops and then some douchebag(s) rained on the 2012 parade. Sometimes I think people have this instant reaction to either think of the worse, or welcome it. Like the joy of impending doom. I'm sure there is psychological term to apply to this mindset.
 
worst_case_scenario.png
 
Ditto. It was all sunshine and lollipops and then some douchebag(s) rained on the 2012 parade. Sometimes I think people have this instant reaction to either think of the worse, or welcome it. Like the joy of impending doom. I'm sure there is psychological term to apply to this mindset.

I think it's called the Xtian mindset. :flame:
 
36674_1401444967823_1583281762_30944064_6307042_n.jpg




Puts a little perspective on things...


Note that this doesn't take into account land-spills - the largest oil spill EVER was the Lakeview Gusher in Kern County, CA, in 1910. It lasted for 8 months and spewed 9 MILLION BARRELS OF CRUDE OIL. That's fucking gargantuan compared to the BP spill. If you've ever been to Kern County... now you know why it's such a shithole.

screen_shot_largest_oil_spills.jpg



The BP spill is highlighted on that map, which does include land spills.
 
^ I think the size of the spill isn't the issue -- it's the fact that there's a higher percentage of Methane than usual. Unfortunately, I don't see a good empirical number in the article other than a "terrifyingly" high 40,000 ppi (or something like that) percentage. The article looks like bullshit to me, despite some of the sources. "Terrifyingly". OOOOOhhhh. I was excited for a minute but now it's business as usual.
 
Doesn't really matter that it's got more methane, unless it's got like 20x the amount of theothers - look at how gargantuanly huge the Gulf Spill was compared to the BP spill.

If you really believe there's a fatty methane bubble that's going to rupture early now, then maybe it matters, but if that's the case, you've got more to worry about than the big bubble of fart gas.
 

Hahahahahahaha. I read a good article a few weeks back that pinned some of the blame on the Federal Government and environmental lobbyists who essentially force these oil companies to drill in totally hostile environments (ie. a mile under the ocean) rather than say, in the Alaskan tundra, home to the world largest mosquito breeding grounds. It went on to joke about BP being forced to drill in that Icelandic volcano in the future in the name of environmental protectionism because surely it's too far removed from everyone and everything to cause much trouble- right?

Of course BP shouldn't have drilled at all if they knew there were such associated risks but there was some truth to the article.

Jeff's map really does put things in perspective too. As terrible a disaster this is, in an age of Eco-vangelism I feel like in relative terms it may not be as bad as others.