Nope, it's still a 9/10 album...if I can say so myself.
I guess I'll have some administration to do at work, because I signed off everything as it was still August!
Anyway, I was talking about the whole record, not the individual songs. Most of them will stand the test of time in a vacuum, but as a record, it's not all that you hype it up to be.
Good old Slave, you knew he'd come steaming in to criticise something that the rest of us are praising, especially something that Jesper was involved in
just can't help himself.
As is often the case Slave, your issue stems from your inability to comprehend that your opinion is not a globally accepted truth. Whilst your opinion is perfectly valid and fine to express, you fall into the same trap you always do of being outraged that most of us have a different view.
Just because you think Stanne's vocals are boring on this record doesn't make it a fact. Just because you think these songs together aren't interesting doesn't make it a fact. Whatever you think MDM's strengths are is irrelevent, as you are on record as calling TJR boring. You don't understand or, as far as I can tell, even really like the genre. You really aren't based placed to comment on it, let alone lecture others on what MDM should or should not be.
As for knocking the scores down in a month or two - I rate Shadowminds and Feel What I Believe higher now than I did when they came out, so probably not.
I know it hurts that these guys just released an album of such quality Anders and Bjorn could only dream of doing the same, but it's going to be OK man.
I have nothing against Jesper, because if I hated every musician who were assholes at some point, I'd run out of stuff to listen to pretty quickly. In fact, I am happy that he seems to be more and more stable, and the shortcomings of this record doesn't really have anything to do with him. I was fine with Cyhra's first record too. I'd only be mad if this record was actually garbage, but I think it's around a solid 7, so you guys fanboying it up to as high as 9.5 is nowhere near in the realm of causing me physical pain.
My opinion is not universal nor is it a law, but there are facts which are hard to argue with. Namely Stanne's dry and uninteresting non-clean vocals and the record's inability to slow down. Yes, I did call TJR boring and while it has grown on me since, I still remain by my opinion that Whoracle was the pinnacle of that early IF sound and not TJR. But whether you agree with it or not, compare those to this record and think again about lecturing what is or isn't mdm's characteristics. If you truly think this record is prime mdm, then it's just a reactionary take. No, you don't have to pinpoint to me all the mdm-ish parts of the songs, but it's just soooo annoying (even with IF) when some mdm-like motif appears in a song and people are slurping all over in the comments "OMFG ITS BACK!!! ANOTHER TRUE MDM BANGER!!!" - no, it's not lol. It shares its family tree with mdm, but don't pretend that there isn't a huge gap between the likes of TJR/Whoracle, Clayman, Natural Born Chaos and this record. Call it whatever you want, but this record omits or underrepresents many of the fun and unique parts of the genre.
But Slave is telling me that I'm wrong because he knows me better than I do. While the fact remains that the rest of us knew what was going to be his reaction. Which means that we know him better than he knows us.
There are many songs or records which quickly run their course, especially if you are hyped up for them. It can work the other way as well, being overly harsh for something and only appreaciating it later. Our Englishmen is a supernatural specimen, we've known that already, but most people function like average people, so if you ask them about the movie they have just seen, then you will hear some overly reactionary takes. It's not until much later that you can actually make a more reasonable judgement. That's why many fan subreddits are pure garbage, because everyone is overdosed on the kool-aid, so every single new material/episode is just the best ever, always.
And you would've said you had known my opinion beforehand if I was giving this record like a 3, so you can't possibly say you knew what my opinion will be, aside from trashing Stanne, who is just an objectively boring singer without his cleans. What was more surprising:
you guys treating this like the second-coming of mdm, or me giving it a favorable review while pointing out its flaws? I think there were better chances of me giving it a 10, than any of you even hovering around the 7 mark.