I think alot of the views by people on this site are VERY biased todo with healthcare reform but I'm not going to get involved
and why should we help him just becuase he is a musician? Well because he is a person and IMO no one should have to die of something that can be treated in a strait forward manner regardless of what society thinks of them.
I spend $8,000 a year on health insurance.
Or find a Canadian girl who'd marry him REAL fast.
Exactly, as with most other private things. Why else go private?
I won't get all deep into this subject since I'm not an american/don't live in the states but damn that was funny and pretty well put Glenn.
Yes it is. Private care is in it for profit.
I can't for the life of me understand the opposition to public care in the US. Stealth Bombers for $1 Billion apiece? No problem!
F22 Raptors that don't work in the rain? Sure!
Health care for the lazy fucks down the road? No fucking way! Not with my tax dollars!
Öwen;8589781 said:If someone gets drunk and hurts themselves for example - you don't stand by and say 'they deserved it', you go and help them.
Wow, you really don't know how America works do you. I can't remember when but someone got struck by a car in NYC and nobody fucking got involved at all, just let the poor bastard lay in the street. Cars just drove around him.
As a country we suck about as hard as you can when it comes to helping people out. Not saying it's a good thing, just saying how it is.
A much more responsible option in my opinion would be to run through a large series of tort reforms, and introduce new regulations for insurance companies that would encourage competition, while temporarily providing subsidies to low income families who wish to get health insurance.