This looks all sorts of shades of fucked up...
(NSFW or Kiddies)
I'm a huge fan of classic horror movies. Shit, Evil Dead, OG Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Halloween, Friday the 13th, Romero zombie films, you name it. I LOVED the first Saw, other ones after that kinda sucked. The Dawn of the Dead remake in 2004 or so was really well done too. I can go on.
But I can't stand movies like Human Centipede, A Serbian Film, etc where the entire point of the film is just to disgust us as much as it possibly can. It's no different imo from Michael Bay films where he just crams in as much CGI explosions as he possibly can and calls it a good movie. If you ask me, horror isn't about over-saturating the audience with gore, or making us view the most absurdly sadistic scenarios the director can think of. Horror is about the lackthereof. What makes Dawn of the Dead or Friday the 13th scary (or rather - what made them scary) is the feeling of "what's going to happen?!" before it happens. The violence and gore were subtle and rather restrained in comparison to other films, but that's okay. It was about the lingering suspense, the sense of urgency and survival, etc.
I think another "modern" example of what makes a horror movie done right was the 2008 remake of Funny Games (I've never seen the original, admittedly). That film did so many things right - including defy all of the expectations we as an audience have for a narrative in a movie. It made the audience feel uncomfortable, scared, and creeped out without showing virtually any gore or grotesque visuals at all! It's all about what you *don't* see that makes it so frightening and disturbing, not about force feeding you offensive material. I find films that do that are few and far between nowadays.
I'll check out The Raid.
Funny Games was the director's way of saying 'if you watch this movie, you are sick and you shouldn't watch this movie.'
He's an amazing director, but Funny Games did not work for me because it was a commentary and attack on the viewers.
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080313/REVIEWS/679566521 (the review is by Jim Emerson)
I also loved the first Saw film. The acting was pretty terrible, but the writing was so darned good (and clever!) and the concept appealed to me. I still very much love the first Saw movie. Overall, I find myself very disappointed with horror movies on the whole. I miss the old Hammer Films, and it irritates me that Hollywood seems to have NO CLUE how to handle Werewolves. The last really GOOD Werewolf movie was An American Werewolf in London - a movie as old as I am. I haven't really been impressed with anything since Saw, though I did enjoy Paranormal Activity. I'm just really picky when it comes to horror films. On the whole, most of them either bore me, irritate me, or outright piss me off. I spent a LOT of time yelling at the TV while watching a DVD of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake.
I watched the Human Centipede because it was free On-Demand around Halloween. I sat there facepalming the entire movie. It was an incredibly stupid movie. And what's worse? They made a sequel! WHY???
Totally agree with you on Saw. I pretend that all those sequels never existed when I watch it. It's really well done, and when it came out it was extremely cerebral and downright scary at times. You literally felt like you were trapped in that room with them. In the theater I was curled up in my seat in suspense by the end!
Funny Games was the director's way of saying 'if you watch this movie, you are sick and you shouldn't watch this movie.'
He's an amazing director, but Funny Games did not work for me because it was a commentary and attack on the viewers.
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080313/REVIEWS/679566521 (the review is by Jim Emerson)
I'm in! My kind of movie!
A serbian film was pretty disturbing. One of those movies you don't want to watch with other people. And you need a shower afterwards....
[/I]
I disagree. It's definitely a good date movie.