Heavy metal discussion on Blissblog

Eh. Same shit that's always brought up. Reynold's sees metal's growing mass appeal linked to how stagnant pop is right now and gets feedback from folks who, if you look close, know as little as he does about the current "scene."

What made this moment of "hipster metal" distinctly different from the current one is that rather than alt-rock types glomming onto an arty offshoot of the mainstream of metal, the bands embraced--Metallica, Anthrax, Megadeath--were among the most popular (with true metalheads) of their day..

His assertion that metal, influenced by punk, began to counter “decadence, folly, corruption, ornament” is off base if one takes a real look at their Sabbath or Priest records, but there’s no denying that punk and it’s influence on grindcore helped blur lines (between punk-metal as well as noise-metal) and began to shift away from the realm of the mystique. The liberal handwringing over “fascist-tendencies” and “misogyny” also gets tiring fast.

I also thought the one reader’s comment on Oaken Throne zine was funny since it’s not “hard to find” at all in any "underground" or metal distros. It's even sold by TheEnd for christsakes but "Wallace Winfrey" buys it from Aquarius. Weird.

And it's a good thing Julian Cope is so fucking nuts in general that not very many people take his article on "metal" seriously, even if a couple bands mentioned in his Guardian piece are very interesting (Wolfmangler).
 
Lord have mercy...the word "trope" there appears twice...and poptomist?...for fuck's sake.

I'm glad that the article made its way in there to make some people think twice about some things.
 
I'm the guy who added that link on metal-archives. I agree, putting it under "fan site" doesn't make much sense, but the other three options (official, merchandise, and tabs) were even less appropriate. That's why I went with "fan site."
 
That is cool, man. It is kind of appropriate in a twisted way. :)