Imagine: An Album Specially Mastered for iTunes...

^ Nope.

It basically just means CD will die and everything will be mastered to "try" to retain quality on MP3s and MP3s only as it's what the masses will only use basically
 
CD's won't die anytime soon, I'm willing to bet on it. Furthermore, due to the natural evolution of technology, low-bitrate compressed digital music is constantly being replaced by better quality. Spotify's Premium quality is already pretty damn decent, and I don't even remember when was the last time I stumbled upon a 128kbps MP3. I honestly believe MP3 will die in favor of lossless formats before the CD format is dead and buried.
 
Not with you on that one - I can wear a T-shirt, there isn't shit I can do with a CD after I've burnt it.
 
Öwen;9971271 said:
Not with you on that one - I can wear a T-shirt, there isn't shit I can do with a CD after I've burnt it.

I guess you're not "people" then :lol: The problem with CDs nowadays is that most folks don't actually listen to CDs, but rip the content to their harddrive and listen from them. I do as well and that makes the CD quite redundant and useless. Still, people want to buy physical media, especially from bands they really dig.

P.S.: Following your logic - you can hardly listen to a T-shirt :p
 
sounds like marketing. which is funny, marketing more "quality" to those who are inherently buying something that is by definition less "quality".
 
How about just up the bitrate to 320kbps...When I A/B between 320kbps and wave in my DAW I can't really tell one damn difference. Honestly, try it yourself, bounce down a wave as the highest quality mp3 possible and try to hear a difference, it is almost impossible. No reason for special itunes mastering just sell it in an audio format that doesn't completely suck.
 
How about just up the bitrate to 320kbps...When I A/B between 320kbps and wave in my DAW I can't really tell one damn difference. Honestly, try it yourself, bounce down a wave as the highest quality mp3 possible and try to hear a difference, it is almost impossible. No reason for special itunes mastering just sell it in an audio format that doesn't completely suck.

Converting to MP3 will still cause digital overs that will of course introduce digital clipping. With metal it is un likely you will hear too many of these clips but if you were to re convert to .wav and play in a cheap stereo the CD player will possibley have issues playing it and can make the clips very noticable. Listening with buds will make it easier to hear these clips too.
 
How do you master 'for' iTunes?

Converting to MP3 will still cause digital overs that will of course introduce digital clipping. With metal it is un likely you will hear too many of these clips but if you were to re convert to .wav and play in a cheap stereo the CD player will possibley have issues playing it and can make the clips very noticable. Listening with buds will make it easier to hear these clips too.

This happens if you leave your master peaking at 0.0dB, but not (or very very rarely) if you leave it at like -0.3dB