Oh... I was just pissed of ALOT because you equated me with George Bush. You fucking dick.
Look, kid, if you're going to espouse viewpoints consonant with those of the Dub, you're just going to have to get over it when people point it out.
Moving Along. Social orders prevent progress
Leaving aside the dubious history of 'progress,' do you really think it is possible in the absence of social order and political stability?
and theres no peace there anyways
Excuse me? Iran is one of the most stable nations in the region, and one that hasn't been to war in two decades. You can't say that about any of their neighbors, nor about most of the major Western democracies.
Just a bunch of zealots promoting thier religion phsycotically.
Somehow, I suspect that you don't quite have a grasp on what constitutes 'psychosis.'
But then, in your mind, the fact that church and state finally got wedged apart in europe is a bad thing to.'
Look, quit projecting YOUR obsessions onto others. No one is talking about 'church and state' except you, and it's not even relevant to the issue at hand. Quit the strawman crap, junior.
I mean, god forbid there be rioting to promote social change.
And this has fuck all to do with the question at hand how? Really man, try to stay on topic...
GOD FUCKING FORBID that a revolt happens, and leads to... say... that fancy ass computer your sitting at right now. Or would you rather be doing this instead of what you doing now?
Uh, social stability is pretty much a prerequisite for technological development. People in disordered societies are too busy not dying today to invent anything. That said, I'm not sure why you're bringing this up at all, given that Iran is one of the most wired nations on the planet. Even their President blogs. The real problem here seems to be
your ignorance of the world outside your own tiny little sphere.
Yeah. thats what I fucking thought. Forget about social change at the cost of a little violence... as long as they maintain peace, who cares about the suffering lower class?
Because, as we know from the experience of the Terror, Stalin, Mao, the Khmer Rouge etc., a little violence in the name of 'suffering lower class' never hurt anyone...