Mikael Åkerfeldt;6089481 said:To be honest, I am a collector myself and I've always had an interest in bootlegs by certain bands, like Sabbath and Priest. I support live/concert bootlegs while I'm against shirt bootlegging as well as bootlegs of our "real" records...I'm inconsistent on the matter so I guess overall I'd say I'm for it. I'm alright with trades but the commerce leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. If somebody was selling Opeth bootlegs as a business I'd certainly not like it, but as for trades and I'm all for it.
It has lost it's original excitement factor in these days of filesharing and all that stuff. When I was younger you went into special record stores and they had "unofficial" Lp records behind the counter. They were always very expensive, ugly and bad sounding...but also rare as hell! I never really bought any.
Cheers
Mike
You just have to keep looking. I've taped* Opeth six times with varying degrees of success. Raleigh (Feb. 15, 2006) turned out the best. I have a similar recording from Budapest in '05 that's just as good. So that's 2 out of ~20 Opeth recordings I have that are above average. 10% sounds about right.I don't like bootlegs because they usually are very bad sounding.
You just have to keep looking. I've taped* Opeth six times with varying degrees of success. Raleigh (Feb. 15, 2006) turned out the best. I have a similar recording from Budapest in '05 that's just as good. So that's 2 out of ~20 Opeth recordings I have that are above average. 10% sounds about right.![]()
*-Taping is good. Bootlegging is bad. Watch your language, people.
this has got to be the only thread MA has responded to that hasnt shot up to 5 pages