Les Paul pickups

xTomx

Member
Oct 29, 2009
860
0
16
Milton Keynes
So last year I replaced the stock Classic 57 and 57+ pickups in my Gibson LP traditional because I wanted something a bit hotter.

I put in a 496r and 500t and hate 'em. They're high output but just sound like cloudy, unclear crap with no attack. What would you guys recommend?
I play hardcore and alternative rock stuff - lots of jazz chords and palm muted stuff.

Ideally looking for something with clarity, not so fussed about high output anymore.
 
This is relevant to my interests. I have an LP Classic with the 496/500 and I'm also looking for something similar to yourself.
 
I have burstbucker pros in my LP standard and it sounds exactly like a les paul should sound.
My eclipse custom has Duncan 59s in it which also sound amazing.
 
FWIW, I've had the 498T/490R and found them to be waaaaaaaaaay too generic-sounding. Also kinda noisy and feedbacky. Quite honestly, I don't tend to like traditional PAF-style pickups. I didn't like the DiMarzio PAF 36th Anni nor the Duncan '59 because I find them all a bit too unaggressive and too smooth.

I'd look into the Duncan Distortion if I were you. :)
 
Do you still have the 57s? If you didn't try them with 500k pots that would be my first port of call before buying any new sets of pickups. I find 500k pots open up the pickups a bit better than the standard 300k pots.

As for Les Paul Bridge pickups, I like the BB3, 57+, and Duncan 59. The Gibson pickups have a bit more of a gritty midrange to me with the Duncan being smoother. I personally don't like high output pickups on my own hard tail instruments.
 
Think I'm risk the 498t, other dudes playing similar genre to mine seem pretty content with it.
,
Output really isn't an issue as it'll get boosted by a Fulltone OCD, comp and then twice on my head.