Lulu Reviews

DuchessOfDork

Member
Feb 9, 2009
2,235
1
36
So Lulu is out today (Lou Reed/Metallica), and I think that the people reviewing their album are in a strange competition to see who can trash it the most creatively. Some of these reviews are downright side-splitting. Here's the ones I've seen so far:

Sound Spike
"That the ill-thought collaboration -- bloated to double-album length at a torturous 87 minutes, which almost feels like taunting -- should never have been made is a given, considering that no single track on the album merits even a full listen, let alone a full repeat spin."

Washington Post
"It’s already been called the worst album of all time, this unholy union of Lou Reed and Metallica, the multi-headed hydra of unpleasantness known colloquially, though not fondly, as Loutallica."

Chicago Tribune
" Then the music dissolves into more than 11 minutes of brain-numbing drone, snuffing out whatever remaining hope of redemption this album might have had. Given their history, that might be the point."
 
USA Today:

And the winner in the category of All-Time Disappointing Collaboration Between Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Inductees: this tedious, tuneless turkey - by a mile - over Ebony and Ivory (sorry, too much melody) and Bowie/Jagger's Dancing in the Street (sorry, done for charity). Kids, next time your rock heroes tell you they're working on a set of very long songs inspired by a century-old German expressionist playwright, petition their record company for an intervention. - Jerry Shriver
 
Sputnik:

"The biggest question Lulu asks of us is this: during the writing, rehearsal, recording and production of the LP, was there a point where any of those involved thought that what they were creating was not 100% acceptable? When Reed presented Metallica with lyric sheets replete with lines about gobbling down on “coloured man’s dicks” and “I’m a woman who likes men” did nobody think to say “Hey, Lou…cut it out.” "

"Was there an alternative, a better to way to do this? Yes, there was."

Blabbermouth:

"As we said at the beginning, this might have sounded good on paper. But someone should have crumpled up that paper and thrown it away."
 
original.jpg
 
I can’t be bothered to read any of your all caps keyboard fat finger mashing about how I’m a moron for not going to bed wearing Kirk Hammett pajamas, resting my head on a Cliff Burton pillow, turning off my Lars Ulrich nightlight and kissing my stuffed James Hetfield doll before falling asleep.

OMG.. brilliant.
 
It's brilliant, because its pissed so many people off.

When was the last time that music so wonderfully did that?
 
Sputnik:

"The biggest question Lulu asks of us is this: during the writing, rehearsal, recording and production of the LP, was there a point where any of those involved thought that what they were creating was not 100% acceptable? When Reed presented Metallica with lyric sheets replete with lines about gobbling down on “coloured man’s dicks” and “I’m a woman who likes men” did nobody think to say “Hey, Lou…cut it out.” "

"Was there an alternative, a better to way to do this? Yes, there was."

Blabbermouth:

"As we said at the beginning, this might have sounded good on paper. But someone should have crumpled up that paper and thrown it away."

Exactly what I've been asking all along. How the hell did it get this far?
 
I think I would rather listen to a re recording of Pink Floyd' Dark Side of the Moon with
John Artch screeching over the entire thing than this unholy mess
 
The thing that makes me laugh the most about this whole thing is how people are declaring this as Metallica's rock bottom, completely ignoring the collab they did with Ja Rule which, as bad as Lulu is, is a million billion times worse.