machines ARE learning how to feel

You could get too attached to your yogurt and lose the intention to eat it. Then it would get sour and tell you: hey bitch I think you forgot something.

Seriously, my wish to immortality has been granted. No need to search the dragonballs anymore.
 
unknown said:
I was going to, but it interfered with my AP Music Theory class.


So how much of our brain do we use, oh one who has taken a psychology class?
Here you are sir...
http://neuralloy.net/brainfaq_files/Neuroanatomy.htm said:
We only use 10% of our brains, right?

In a word: wrong. I have searched in vain for the source of this widely quoted mis-statement about brain function. Humans, like other animals, use their brains to their fullest extent every day, just to go about the daily activities of living. By and large, we are not even aware of how much processing our brains must perform to accomplish seemingly simple tasks, such as finding our way home from work, or planning what to fix for dinner. The ability to almost instantly pick out the face of our child in a gaggle of schoolchildren, or to recognize the pattern of muscle tension in our spouse’s face that indicates worry, requires processing algorithms far beyond what the most sophisticated of today’s computers can do (and remember, a computer operates at a vastly higher speed than our brain does).

As we shall eventually see, it is the nature of the brain to make cognitive processes much more efficient with practice, and consequently to require much less conscious thought. For those things the brain is genetically programmed to do, it learned to do them well early in life, and they now seem effortless. By contrast, many of the things we ask our brains to do in service of our social responsibilities remain difficult throughout life. Attempting to remain alert and attuned constantly to new stimuli (such as the lectures of a college professor) is a very difficult thing to do, because it requires the brain to both attend to new information while simultaneously trying to process and make memories of the stuff that came just before. Daydreaming in class is not a character flaw, it is the brain’s efforts to try to carry out its original program. Trying to determine patterns in and make sense of new data is another example of a brain-intense thing to do. Those who are asked to do a lot of this in their societal role, such as medical students, have a hard time imagining being able to sustain it for an entire career. In fact, even the complex patterns of patient symptoms which suggest an illness become familiar, require less conscious attention, and so become easy for experienced physicians.

Perhaps this is the grain of truth in the famous 10% saying. If we can direct our conscious attention to new and difficult stimuli for 10% of our entire day, then we are doing quite well indeed. We need that other 90% to come to grips with what we have learned, to process it into more efficient pathways, and make it easier and less effortful to use.

Below is a diagram of different areas of the brain. Also what these areas tasks are.
brain.gif


Can't believe all tossed around facts..... :Spin:
 
satanicnugz said:
Here you are sir...


Below is a diagram of different areas of the brain. Also what these areas tasks are.
brain.gif


Can't believe all tossed around facts..... :Spin:


I can see where porn could cover more than one of those areas...
 
TheDreamingMind said:
Yeah I see your point, after all you could equip a machine with self replication and evolution programming and possiblly simulated emotions, but it would still be following basic commands. Since we lack understanding of what exactly consciousness really is it's a bit presumptious to assume we could simply implant this awareness into a machine. If anything it's more likely that a machine will develop more understanding of what consciousness is just by the pure speed of its intellectual evolution (Moore's law or something akin). In that case perhaps the machine itself could eventually create cybernetic life within itself, if it so wished to. That's one idea anyway.

The cybernetic life form would have to have means to physically create new vessels for itself, otherwise it will run out of hard disk space, however if it is connected to the internet and if it could take over any machine connected to it, this would not be a problem. It would be a whole new dimension thoughtspace to explore. The main problem I would see is how the irrationalities of life, such as emotions, sexual impulses and the like would transfer over to a machine which can only be programmed to obey rational commands. I can see how it can be possible when comparing the biological structure to the mechanical structure, but I can't see how a human could program it to be so. I don't think that you could actually make a machine "human" so to speak because of the metaphysical differences between the way that a computer thinks and the way that a human thinks.* Can a machine manufacture for itself a will-to-power?

Jesus, It's like Space Odyssey all over again.

*of course right now there is a good chance I'm talking out of my ass.