In the recent threads discussing metallica, some have said that their decision to make a video for "One" really helped alter their opinions regarding this once great band. In the mid 80s, Metallica claimed they'd never do a video.
And then they did.
However, other heavy bands of the era made videos prior to Metallica. Megadath had videos for "Wake Up Dead" and "Peace Sells". Anthrax shot videos for "Madhouse" and "Indians". Testament had vids for "Trial By Fire" and "Over the Wall". King Diamond shot vids for "Family Ghost" and "Welcome Home". Heck, even Celtic Frost released a video for the classic "Circle of the Tyrants".
Then Slayer did a video for "Seasons in the Abyss".
Did these bother you, as well? Or, since (to my knowledge) these bands never claimed that they would never shoot videos, are you not bothered by it?
In 1989, was a video an act of "selling out", or is it simply a means by which to bring your music more exposure? Spread the metal message, as it were?
And, of course, none of the songs/videos mentioned above are soft, commercial sell-out tunes.
And then they did.
However, other heavy bands of the era made videos prior to Metallica. Megadath had videos for "Wake Up Dead" and "Peace Sells". Anthrax shot videos for "Madhouse" and "Indians". Testament had vids for "Trial By Fire" and "Over the Wall". King Diamond shot vids for "Family Ghost" and "Welcome Home". Heck, even Celtic Frost released a video for the classic "Circle of the Tyrants".
Then Slayer did a video for "Seasons in the Abyss".
Did these bother you, as well? Or, since (to my knowledge) these bands never claimed that they would never shoot videos, are you not bothered by it?
In 1989, was a video an act of "selling out", or is it simply a means by which to bring your music more exposure? Spread the metal message, as it were?
And, of course, none of the songs/videos mentioned above are soft, commercial sell-out tunes.