as far back in time as its existence, drugs have always been a part of modern society, especially in the arts. if you were to take the musicians who took drugs and compared it to the musicians who didnt do drugs, which side would you be on?
would you want drugs banned, and never again have any music inspired by them (remember this includes the stones, zepplin, hendrix, etc.) or do you think that most drugs should be allowed for creative purposes?
i just saw scott weiland got arrested yet again for drug charges. poor guy cant get a break. yet we let fucktards like halli berry get away with hit and run, or wynona rider get away with stealing thousands of dollars worth of clothes. i dont think its right
my whole point is that while drugs might be dangerous, theyre a necessity. you?
would you want drugs banned, and never again have any music inspired by them (remember this includes the stones, zepplin, hendrix, etc.) or do you think that most drugs should be allowed for creative purposes?
i just saw scott weiland got arrested yet again for drug charges. poor guy cant get a break. yet we let fucktards like halli berry get away with hit and run, or wynona rider get away with stealing thousands of dollars worth of clothes. i dont think its right
my whole point is that while drugs might be dangerous, theyre a necessity. you?