Not trying to start an Iraq debate but it's been 3 years

bush is planning 'strategic attacks' against Iran's nuclear program
if iran wanted to it could get dozens of old soviet bombs
as could many countries

did you know that the USA tried to drag the brits into the veitnam war?
harold wilson refused to send troops but couldn't disclose his opposition
and had to appear in support of the US for fear of economic repercussions
 
JayKeeley said:
I saw a picture the other day from May 1st 2003 when Bush 'landed' on the navy carrier and announced "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED".

Man, here we are 3 years later and look at the turmoil. They're on the brink of civil war! That's 'mission accomplished'?

Ravioli? Holy canoli.

And now I shall return to my van down by the river.

farley-1-thumb.jpg

Isn't the only time "mission accomplished crossed his mind"

bush_no_missionaccomplished.jpg
 
Claws of Perdition said:
That has been a common trend over the last 100 years unfortunatly :mad:

"righto you aussies put those bayonets on your rifles and give me your bullets, what we are doing is storming those bloody machine guns up there, ready.. GO!" /crappy attempt at british accent.

now that's british
 
Did anyone hear the 9/11 tapes yet? They just aired them on the local news here... :ill: Very very sad.

Actually, releasing those tapes now should remind us exactly why it was we invaded Iraq. Those baghdad bastards deserve everything they get.
 
Dude you know that's what is going to happen. I read some poll once, something like 54% of the respondents said we got Saddam because of his involvement in 9/11. I mean, what the fuck man. We aren't even dealing with chimps anymore, because chimps are smart. Americans = pigeons.
 
several recent polls were deemed statistically irrelevant when the most common response from american subjects was, "shhh! everybody loves raymond is on!" a close second was, "huh?"