+VictimOfTheNight+
Active Member
- Aug 9, 2006
- 8,620
- 113
- 63
Seriously Nobel prize for Obama? For what? War?
Noooooo, but Bush would have deserve that...
Seriously Nobel prize for Obama? For what? War?
┼Victim of the Night┼;8612175 said:Noooooo, but Bush would have deserve that...
I guess Br00tal would go with Vidkun Quisling
I guess Br00tal would go with Vidkun Quisling
What has Obama done in order of stopping the war?
┼Victim of the Night┼;8612268 said:I'm just saying... Bush was so terrible, in my opinion, that he would have deserved a "Nobel for wars". A negative prize, yes.
As for Obama winning this shit, i hope it doesn't influence him to send fewer troops, or even worse, pulling out of afghanistan, as anyone with an IQ above 10 should realize what this would result in.
The way I see it is, that americans think that Obama is some kinda "hero" after Bush, but in the end they don't differ so much.
The stupidest thing about this is that the deadline for being nominated was only 11 days after he was officially made president and brought into office.
I don't think anyone thinks that. Nobody that I know thinks he's any kind of hero, anyway. But, looking at the bright side- most of the people here, in america, were finally tired of Bush's shit and at least decided to give someone with different ideas a try. I mean, we could have elected John McCain, and that would have really sucked, haha. I know a lot of people who voted for McCain, too, though... =
If I were a citizen I'd vote for McCain. Bush may have been a dick, but the democratic party agenda is just /facepalm
At least, when I was reading it, it felt like it was written by people with no knowledge of how international relations work.
I didn't bother to read all the replies, but just because he's less aggressive than Bush doesn't make him deserve this. A president of a country which is in war doesn't deserve a peace price.