Yes, Bruce started and brought it on himself but the point that I keep trying to make is that it's the FANS that suffered most out of this whole thing. They were the ones disappointed by the ruined set, they were the ones who payed their hard earned cash to see both Maiden and Ozzy play. Yes, Bruce should have kept his big gob shut but they should not have sabotaged their set, and had it out with them afterwards. From other stories I've heard, and from Sharon's rant, she had no problem with the rest of Maiden and that Steve had apologised for Bruce's behaviour. So do you think she was right to take it out on the WHOLE band, when it was just one person that started it? There are pictures of Janick, Steve and Nicko covered in egg and yet according to Sharon, she had no problem with the rest of the band - only Bruce.
If the fans still got their full set, then they are being a little too thin-skinned about the whole incident. They didn't shoot them with a gun, they egged them. You're apt to get egged walking down the street on Halloween, it's not the end of the world. I guess if you can't curb your mouthpiece, you get egged along with him. It doesn't hurt you and it washes off your clothes and guitars. You're gonna take a shower after a show in the desert heat anyway.
Shit goes wrong at shows all the time. This was a little different, but I will venture to say that if the Maiden fans didn't BOO Bruce when he dissed Ozzy, then to an extent they were complicit and deserved to have their show interrupted. Of course if they had then they would join the other American fans Bruce talks down to after taking their money.
I like Iron Maiden, but I am not a blind loyalist who will defend them when they are wrong. Usually when they ARE wrong it's because Bruce opens his mouth to insult somebody, or an entire nation in the case of the United States of America. I am a fan, but not a blind nutswinger. I don't like that they basically LIED about the makeup of the setlist for this tour when selling tix, then foisted all the new stuff on people. Sure, you can trot your lawyer out to point out the technicality of it, but everybody knows they made a strong implication that this would be another classics tour with a smattering of new stuff, not a tour of new stuff with a smattering of classics.
I like their music, but I don't like their arrogance, nor their dishonesty. They knew if they'd said they were gonna focus mostly on 2000s material that their sales would be much less. So they lied, or misled at the very least, sold the tix and pulled the classic bait and switch.
All just my opinion. I'm entitled to it, as you are entitled to yours. I just don't like being insulted as an American because Bruce wants to pretend that Maiden are as relevant in 2010 as they were in 1985. He should appreciate that we want to hear the good stuff instead of the mediocre later-day stuff, the tepid prog wannabe stuff they write today.
If they actually wrote material that approached the classic stuff I'd be open to it. But they're not, and the unconditional love of the hardcore fans has coddled the band into thinking they are still on top of their game writing-wise.
Playing-wise, they are; writing-wise, no way.
So if you want to insult me for liking your actual best material, Bruce, then right back at'cha. I have no use for you if you hold my country in contempt.