Presidential Debates

Cryptkeeper said:
The first of the debates are on tonight. Who's watching? I know I will watch all of them. I'm wondering if Kerry will flip-flop during them.
Im going to watch when I can, but you can be sure hes going to get busted I some lie............................. Mabey I`ll tape it.....................
 
Bush`s statments on what needs to be done with North Korea are absolutly right on.............. we need all of those other countrys to put pressure on them............... but kerry thinks he can do it himself.....................pretty arrogant if you ask me....................

Kerry also contradicted himself quite a few times in regards to Saddam........... First he said Saddam was a threat.............then he said saddam wasnt a threat
he admited he voted to invade Iraq, but saddam wasnt a threat? what the fuck is up with this dude?............................
 
I was extremely disappointed with both of them!!

But at least I felt like G.W. was trying to be honest whereas Kerry seemed to be trying to say what people wanted to hear (Shades of Bill Clinton)

Hopefully the two of them will come off a little better at the next one.
 
CoverUinOil said:
fuck what these two have to say about N.Korea, let the Chinese deal with it, they're right next door and have a much bigger army. The only problem is, they're both communist!
But kerry said it at least 4-5 times.............he wants to do it himself
 
oh yeah Poland, the only thing i know about them is all those jokes.... oh and wana talk about flipflopers, they join europe to help their strenght in economy and what is the first thing they do, order F15 from the US. All they wanted was the big money from all the other countries and not give anything back. By the way, all those 30 some countries that are in iraq are not doing much. each one of them has less than 100 soldiers there. And what do they do? Protect their embassies. i dont really call that an allie. And since china is becoming the new Buddy-buddy of Bush, how come they're not sending any troops over there, they're the biggest army in the world so why shouldnt they become part of the 90% casualties???? At least help relief some of the weight off of america's shoulders.
 
CoverUinOil said:
oh yeah Poland, the only thing i know about them is all those jokes.... oh and wana talk about flipflopers, they join europe to help their strenght in economy and what is the first thing they do, order F15 from the US. All they wanted was the big money from all the other countries and not give anything back. By the way, all those 30 some countries that are in iraq are not doing much. each one of them has less than 100 soldiers there. And what do they do? Protect their embassies. i dont really call that an allie. And since china is becoming the new Buddy-buddy of Bush, how come they're not sending any troops over there, they're the biggest army in the world so why shouldnt they become part of the 90% casualties???? At least help relief some of the weight off of america's shoulders.

Good point! Why doesn´t states like Nigeria, Russia and Indonesia carry a larger portion of the U.N. forces... oh yeah forgot... they are to busy waging wars on their own citizens...
 
french_anatheman said:
hum, is it true that these debates are essential for the final results???
If so, they're both zero, so i don't see any solution.



The point of the debates is not for either candidate to be preaching to the converted. If you are a Democrat or a Republican, you already know who you are going to vote for. What either person says is really not going to alter your opinion.


These debates are geared for swing voters and Independants who are up in the air for who they're going to vote for (people like myself). Because (right or wrong) there are a lot of people who really don't give a shit which party you are in. They care about hearing from each MAN about their own policies. Those are the people that will make a difference in the election.

And I have to say that based on what I saw, Kerry looked to be a more viable candidate. But Bush has two more debates to prove me wrong.