egan.
daylightdies.com
I think if you just need lots of plugins on a mix it makes more sense to upgrade your computer, but if you need to reliably do (for example) 24 in's @ 96k with low latency it's still hard to argue with HD(X).
Pro Tools HD Advice
- Thread starter TonyS.
- Start date
Mikaël-ange
Member
- Nov 7, 2008
- 2,368
- 1
- 36
HD native don't have any dsp power so no.
What HD native do is low latency monitoring for overdub on mix (as low as 32 to 64 samples). Also the card handle the mixer and the I/O routing.
If you mainly mixing and do some occasional vocal overdub, and don't need more than 64 I/O; HD native make sense.
+1
With HD TDM/HDX you can have a 100+ track session running, full of plugins and hardware insert, and record 32 tracks at once without changing anything on you session, and that with close to zero latency monitoring.
Mikaël-ange
Member
- Nov 7, 2008
- 2,368
- 1
- 36
Btw here an interesting thread about HD native on gearslutz.
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/pro-tools-10-hdx/662920-heres-what-hd-native-can-do.html
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/pro-tools-10-hdx/662920-heres-what-hd-native-can-do.html
Yesterday, I was at the Avid / Universal Audio Tour in Berlin...after a lot of talking with UA and testing the new Apollo and Apollo 16, I will definetly go with a Pro Tools 11 Native system + a Apollo Quad.
Fuck HDX...by the way a lot of bugs at the stage
...also they are still touring with the beta, so a finished version may be far away?!
Fuck HDX...by the way a lot of bugs at the stage
...also they are still touring with the beta, so a finished version may be far away?!
