The recent Saxon records have all been stellar, IMO. However, I've read mixed reviews about Dogs of War and am wondering if the album is worth owning. Is it as strong as recent albums (Lionheart, Metalhead, Unleash the Beast, Killing Ground)?
Wyvern said:"Dogs Of War" is an excellent album, to me far more superior than "Solid Ball Of Rock", "Metalhead", "Forever Free", "Destiny", "Rock The Nations".
T.I.E. said:yeah, last Saxon albums are pretty cool but, still, nothing beats the "classic" era (from Wheels of Steel to Crusader)
T.I.E. said:sure, they sound more heavy.... but Biff used to have a better voice. age damaged it (to a minor extent) and made it a tad tiresome for me...
details and complexity in music isn't always good imo, I like the simpler Saxon work - even if the riffs are predictable etc.. that's what makes AC/DC fun, that's what makes MANY bands good bandsFred B said:I think as good as wheels of steel and denim and leather were for their time......they lack the power of the newer releases that the band are putting out now. I mean, the earlier records guitar work had a pretty simple AcDc like quality that doesnt sound as heavy as the stuff they are putting out today .
T.I.E. said:nope, to my shame I've seen Saxon only once... on their Crusader tour...
maybe I'll give 'em a try if the tickets are not too expensive...
Hawk said:I agree with Fred. The old albums are great but I like the newer ones better. they sound more up to date and the playing on it is just more metal.
ElectricWiz said:I did notice in your parenthitical list that you didn't mention Heavy Metal Thunder, which came out between Killing Ground and Lionheart. It's actually re-recordings of old classics. That's a risky experiment to be sure, but in their case it works. Hearing, say, Crusader or Motorcycle Man with modern sounding amps and an up to date drummer turns out to be a treat. I'm a die hard guy for the old stuff, but that album is very good.