State Sovereignty Issue

[Dak]

I was using hyperbole. Thank you for taking everything literally. I didn't mean they wouldn't actually have heads.

My guess is that you want essentially what Thomas Jefferson wanted.
It's funny, though, because I thought you were also all gung-ho national security...not really compatible with decentralization.

Because I took the headless thing literally

National Security is kind of a vague term, and gets used as an excuse to trample personal rights.

I am a minimalist when it comes to national government, but one of it's few legit responsibilities is the common defense. I am for a strong national defense.

 

[sadistik necrofiend]

Here is some links about the current fiasco that helped me with some info.



http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=88218 (possibly a little right wing news source so some people say, but thats not the point)

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2009/02/16.html

http://infowars.com/resources/states-rights.html

 

[Dak]

Minnesota HF 997

 

[sadistik necrofiend]

I would highly recommend if you have the means to do so to listen to the coast to coast am broadcast on this issue that is from last Monday Night.

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2009/02/16.html

This is a really good insight with some good info and some State Reps speaking out on the issue.

Some of the best information I have found on this issue overall is from this show.