I produced the PaganFest 2 tour in Minnesota and I thought Swashbuckle was pretty good.
Now having said that, let's clarify.
#1 - I would never ever consider them "Pagan Metal."
#2 - I don't even know if I would consider them "Pirate Metal" - whatever the f*** that even means.
#3 - I don't (necessarily) have a problem with them being on the PaganFest tour. They weren't a headliner, they were a "warm-up" band. Warm-up bands do not necessarily have to fall in line for what the rest of the tour is accomplishing. This has been done since the dawn of time.
I would be curious to hear you all compare and contrast bands like Running Wild, AleStorm and now Swashbuckle. Since the three are similar, are we picking on Swashbuckle because they happen to be from the US?
I don't think "Gimmick Metal" is necessarily a bad thing. I will readily admit that DF (which used to be one of my favorite bands) is now more of a gimmick than a real band. But the word "Gimmick" seems to be a fancy new label for a term we use(d) a lot - SELLOUT. I don't always think the two terms are synonymous. I remember a lot of positive feedback on PowerGlove on here when they went around with DF and they are obviously, obviously Gimmick Metal. But they do it really well, so ... what's the problem?
Now if Swashbuckle ever headlined PaganFest, I think there would be a legitimate room for griping.
Just my two pesos ...
Nathan