i could never understand why syphony x doesn't give credit where its due...
like why could they not include in the liner notes info like "this track based on Mozart's requiem" or "part II of the divine wings of tragedy is based on Mars by Holst."?
i don't think its plagiarism at all that they have used older classical music in some parts of their songs, but i think it is quite unproffessional not to give credit and mention where they get EACH piece from...how would they feel if people started rippping their music and not giving credit? just because mozart is dead and can't sue it doesn't mean that its ok
WHY is it unproffessional? well i have seen SX get a lot of flak for their "plagiarising of composers"... every discussion i have had about symphony x, if someone ever was criticizing it was about that...it just takes a lot from the credibility of a band the first time you find out something likkke this. it also makes me wonder...just how much of their music has been taken from classical pieces that i haven't heard before? as far as my knowledge of classical music goes, it could be all of it! what i'm trying to say is there are so many pieces out there that they could easily take something from an obscure one and try to pass it as their own even if some things we have noticed are more obvious...
if they would step up and give credit where it is due we would know how much of the music is actually theirs and how much isn't
i am a big fan of symphony x and i don't think any worse of them because of this, but i still think they shouldn't exclude such information from the liner notes...
what do you think?
has the band ever said anything in defense?
like why could they not include in the liner notes info like "this track based on Mozart's requiem" or "part II of the divine wings of tragedy is based on Mars by Holst."?
i don't think its plagiarism at all that they have used older classical music in some parts of their songs, but i think it is quite unproffessional not to give credit and mention where they get EACH piece from...how would they feel if people started rippping their music and not giving credit? just because mozart is dead and can't sue it doesn't mean that its ok
WHY is it unproffessional? well i have seen SX get a lot of flak for their "plagiarising of composers"... every discussion i have had about symphony x, if someone ever was criticizing it was about that...it just takes a lot from the credibility of a band the first time you find out something likkke this. it also makes me wonder...just how much of their music has been taken from classical pieces that i haven't heard before? as far as my knowledge of classical music goes, it could be all of it! what i'm trying to say is there are so many pieces out there that they could easily take something from an obscure one and try to pass it as their own even if some things we have noticed are more obvious...
if they would step up and give credit where it is due we would know how much of the music is actually theirs and how much isn't
i am a big fan of symphony x and i don't think any worse of them because of this, but i still think they shouldn't exclude such information from the liner notes...
what do you think?
has the band ever said anything in defense?