ive only listened to marriage part 1 and this is just well thought out intelligent power metal with a progressive flare. the guys voice is quite excellent. ill admit they get a twee "flowery" at times, but it doesnt descend into the realm of gay, and somehow it makes the songs better.
Yeah, this probably wasn't the greatest thread to bump IMO, there are some better VS discussions elsewhere in the archives (some more recent as well if I recall).
Anyway, your thoughts are precisely my thoughts on that album. The "flowery" interludes and vocalisms are why I hesitated at first to recommend them to you, but since you mentioned them I decided to chime in.
J. said:
part 2 and invictus tonight. gotta wait for atreus 1 before listening to atreus 2
Part 2 has a very similar vibe to part 1 in both style and substance. Invictus is where David DeFeis started losing the ability to sing at a higher octave regularly and it makes that album a much darker experience. His voice on the latter is definitely far more raspy than earlier works, but in the end I enjoy both styles immensely. Ironically though, his greatest higher pitch vocal watermark comes at the end of Invictus in the form of the amazing Veni, Vidi, Vici. Gives me chills every single time I hear it.
J. said:
btw, is anything pre marriage 1 worth grabbing. reading this thread it seems some think they are worth grabbing while others say stick with the 5 ive got.
Yes, you definitely want to acquire the 1997 re-release version of "Age of Consent". It was completely re-worked with multiple new tracks that rank among some of VS's best ever. The original release is primarily made up of hard rock style tracks that typified the band's late 80's early 90's output, but the re-release gives it that "Marriage of Heaven and Hell" vibe and completely transforms the album. While it's still a bit uneven due to the varying styles, tracks like "Cry for Pompeii", "Lion In Winter" and "Perfect Mansions" make it more than worth your time.
Definitely steer clear of "Life Among the Ruins". "Noble Savage" is ok, with maybe 2 standout tracks, but it's mostly dated hard rock. I'm not as familiar with the band's earliest output, but some hold the album "Guardians of the Flame" in high regard. Jack Starr was the primary influence in the band in those days as opposed to DeFeis.
J. said:
also, reading about visions of eden (their latest), many say its not even metal, with a love it or hate it vibe
Overall I really enjoy it, but there's definitely way more energy in the first 5 tracks or so. Afterwards it's wholly introspective and a chore to get through on the first few listens. It pays off over time though, and based on the quaility of the first part of the album I think it's worth obtaining, though not as essential as some of the other albums.