Waves Tune

[Brett - K A L I S I A]

Anyone here tried this new toy yet ?

 

[gumplunger]

Before this turns into an "auto-tune is evil" discussion, I haven't tried this one, but it looks similar to Melodyne, if not a bit user-friendlier. If it can avoid some of the weird artifacts that Melodyne creates, it might be good for having around for singers you just want out of your hair.

 

[black sugar]

Anyone here tried this new toy yet ?

So did you land the new Hillary Duff record then?

Before this turns into an "auto-tune is evil" discussion...

I'm not going to say it's evil, but I will say that it's usually faster to get someone to just punch in and do it right in the first place. And that refers to all editing, not just robo-tune.

If someone has no business singing on a record and it's your job (as in you're somehow obligated) to record or mix them, that's another discussion entirely.

 

[Lopes]

I'm also curious to see how this thing works.

 

[James Murphy]

this functionality, with almost the identical interface, is built into Digital Performer... the upgrade that added the feature was free.

 

[Genius Gone Insane]

What interests me most is being able to change the notes--I wonder how solid Tune is at that.

 

[Nitronium Blood]

this functionality, with almost the identical interface, is built into Digital Performer... the upgrade that added the feature was free.

How similar would DP be compared to Pro Tools. Would a person currently studying PT be able to use DP pretty much the same?

 

[Kazrog]

this functionality, with almost the identical interface, is built into Digital Performer... the upgrade that added the feature was free.

Yup, I was just gonna post that. Waves has been putting out some lame, overpriced, and unoriginal shit lately - from GTR to Q-Clone and now this.

 

[Frank'nfurter]

Anyone here tried this new toy yet ?

No, not personally. But I'd see it in action. Amazing!
It seems to be more reliable and versatile than Auto Tune.

Franky