I guess it shows how safe European cities are generally that one man shooting a few people in front of a McDonalds grinds the whole city to a halt and causes widespread terror. The media really didn't help this one.
Kids were killed by a religious extremist, I highly doubt these places are very safe in the grand scheme of terrorist trends within Europe.
Also, religious terrorists usually are right-wing extremists. They're not exactly two separate categories.
They're pretty safe, terrorist acts just get coverage way out of proportion to the actual casualty count. People get shot up in American cities for criminal reasons on a daily basis.
Well yeah fine, but you didn't have any problem understanding me. Non-Islamic right wing extremists if we're going to be anal about it.
It's not the violence that matters here, but the context and reasoning behind the violence and it's threat to civilisation that drug gangs murdering each other doesn't present in the same way.
I don't really feel the need to frame it in that way, if you do, fine.
Yes, but only if we choose to view it in that way. The real damage is caused by the fear of terrorism, rather than the act itself, which is actually kind of what you're saying. At any rate you're less likely to get shot by a terrorist in Munich than stabbed by a mugger in Baltimore.
And you're more likely to get hit by a car than have your house robbed, would you say based on that to not have security? Stop being retarded.
Because playing terrorist attack footage on constant rotation on the news is in any way comparable to having home security.