What is the MASTERING ORDER ?

I get the song mixed, mixing through a limiter on the master bus.
Once I'm happy with the mix I'll remove the limiter and bounce out the mix.
The mix is then imported into a new session and I'll get on with mastering, if anything doesn't sound right after mastering then I'll go back and adjust the mix.
 
Eq, Comp, Limiter

That's the order.

welll.....some people work like that and often it makes sense...not always.

I think that MANY people on this forum haven't even understood yet what mastering really is, else they wouldn't even ask a question like this (or reply with a fix order like that).....

my advice would be: first find out what mastering actually means and what it's supposed to do, then think about the tools you'll need for that, if you know the tools and if you know what you wanna achieve with them you'll also know the order.

there is no "preset" in mastering
 
Today I used this chain:

CraneSong Phoenix-> Smart C2->EQ->Softclipper->Multiband Comp->Limiter->Hardclip->Clipping Converters->Limiter->Dither

the other day I used this:
Comp->EQ->Clipper->Dither....

also....don't forget that fades, transitions, creating track markers, ISRC lists etc is all a part of the mastering Job.
 
@ Lasse Lammert

You are so right!

Mastering for some means LOUD levels, where it should be about psychoacoustic check and relative level check and rms check and what you can bring to the track to make it shine even more than what the mixing engineer did with the original mix.

But we all know that anyway.

There are no real orders to master a track, this is the truth but, the basic are normally around that; EQ,COMP,Limit;

But sometimes a tracks might demands for more so then you could use a slight touch of stereo imager, Mid/Side Eq'ing, Reverb, Parallel compression, name it.

Sometimes a Limiter does the job, it depends of your source and how well it was mixed, but it all depends.