Out of curiosity, why would bands care what they track with when you will just reamp it later?
The feel of playing through an actual good amp/cab is nowhere near where ampsims are, plus there's the latency that is just way too gay.
You guys can praise ampsims as much as you want, it's just not the same thing.
Also, as someone already said, hook the "thru" of your DI to your amp input, it's as simple as that.
The only thing I've gotten is "It's not as powerful as a real amp".. Or "That's how we did it at the other studio".
Fuckin' Divas.
Maybe they are insecure with their playing and need a big rig to make up some lack of balls^^
for sure ampsims aren't nearly anywere near playing the real deal, but why should you need that for recording? as long as there's no latency you can do your job anyway
Or maybe they just want you to do YOUR job and provide them with whatever they want, since they're paying you.
I can't really see a more important time (recording) that you would want an ideal setup for tracking.
It worked! Thanks dude!I do this all the time on my Saffire, I just route the input of the DI guitar out to 2 separate outputs. One goes to the DAW and the other goes to output 10 on my Saffire and then to the amp.
I usually track the mic'd cab as well just incase the tone we got the first time works. So I record the DI and the actual amp at the same time.
Works like a charm.
In fact the project I am working on now we did the same thing using the AxeFX, ran the guitar into the Axe, and then split the signal one to the amp mods and out the XLR in the back and one out the FX loop which was a totally clean DI.