Apparently the words "reduce", "risk", and "regular" are all being misunderstood.
Lmao, sounds like lawyers from some ivy league school playing a prank or something. No one is dumb enough to take labels that literally.
Also even if it "reduces the risk of dehydration" for a short time, it still reduces the risk of dehydration overall by a small amount. You have a finite life, part of that finite life now has a reduced risk of dehydration after consuming that water bottle.
Did he change how campaigns are financed?
The people who consider themselves “cosmopolitan” in today’s West, by contrast, are part of a meritocratic order that transforms difference into similarity, by plucking the best and brightest from everywhere and homogenizing them into the peculiar species that we call “global citizens.”
This species is racially diverse (within limits) and eager to assimilate the fun-seeming bits of foreign cultures — food, a touch of exotic spirituality. But no less than Brexit-voting Cornish villagers, our global citizens think and act as members of a tribe.
I'm confused, and not in a contentious way, just disinterestedly confused - is tribalism supposed to be good, or bad? Because I think we often tend to excuse it when it suits our comforts, and demonize it when it doesn't. I'm not sure what the criticism is, because it's clear that tribalism has its benefits and its drawbacks.
don't worry dak i'm sure some other horrible cunt will take his place