Bush Pardons Thanksgiving turkey

xfer

I JERK OFF TO ARCTOPUS
Nov 8, 2001
25,932
13
38
46
New York City
www.geocities.com
Innocent Afghan shopkeeper in Gitmo/retarded Lenny-clone in Texas sobs upon hearing story.


http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/11/24/turkey/index.html


story.bush.turkey.jpg


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush Monday pardoned the national Thanksgiving turkey, marking the 56th anniversary of the annual event. Apart from some gobbling while the president spoke, the lucky turkey, Stars, was generally well behaved during the Rose Garden ceremony.
 
i think if anything Bush will stay in Iraq too short, not too long. i think he's trying to get out of there as quickly as possible, no matter how many corners have to be cut.

and i don't think the President should waste his time attending grunts' funerals. especially when there's a a few thousand more comin' down the pike.
 
xfer said:
i think if anything Bush will stay in Iraq too short, not too long. i think he's trying to get out of there as quickly as possible, no matter how many corners have to be cut.

and i don't think the President should waste his time attending grunts' funerals. especially when there's a a few thousand more comin' down the pike.
My new prescient prediction is that the majority of our forces will be out of Iraq by the end of summer 2004 if not sooner. The admin. is already making rumblings about the Iraqis being ready to take control of their own government.
 
I don't know if I mentioned this before here, but the latest New Yorker has a really good piece about the reconstruction effort in Iraq, and the terrible, amateurish, fumbling mistakes the Administration made. I guess the had originally planned to have the reconstruction done by August, elections by September, and the US out by October.

You can argue about the need for war or lack thereof, but can you really argue that if the US is going to end up going in and smushing a country, it ought to stay for as long as necessary and spend as much money and effort and lives as necessary to help prop it back up?

I guess it will be a measure of Bush's moral mettle to see if he follows through with the money and troops needed, and doesn't listen to the conservative get-us-outers or the liberal get-us-outers, pulling the US nicely in time for the 2004 election and leaving Iraq ruled by another mustachioed thug or two or three.
 
my thoughts:

the govn't fucked up and put us in a situation we can't back out of. they didn't plan well in advance and it's too fucking late. pulling out too early would be disastrous so we gotta stick it out and finish what we started. I'm pissed b/c it was an obvious quagmire from the get-go. no way it was gonna be wrapped up by election season. fucking morons.
 
I don't think it was a quagmire, by my understood definition of the term. A president who hates nation-building tends to be pretty okay with saying "time to cut the bastards loose" before tens of thousands of deaths manage to pile up.
 
lizard said:
I'm saying that he should face the people whose deaths he's caused. and he should state his case face to face with our people before he does it for others.
I do agree.

It'd be pretty rude to blow up a country, overthrow their government, kill 7000 civilians, then just run away. FalseTodd, is it true that the admin. is already talking about (effectively) pulling out of Iraq? That's quite shocking.
 
Yeah The Daily Show had an amazing segment that was a point-counterpoint between George W. Bush, Governor, and George W. Bush President.

(paraphrasing): Governor: "I don't believe we should use our troops for nation-building."

President: "We must ensure that the Iraqi people are given a stable democracy and the freedoms that all people should enjoy."
 
I think that Vietnam was a quagmire because there were real forces keeping the U.S. in the war--namely, the Cold War and Soviet involvement. I think the only thing keeping the U.S. in Iraq is international opinion (which doesn't count for much to the U.S. anymore), domestic opinion (which will turn against staying in once the American deaths really start to pile up--we're nothing if not a selfish nation), and a notion that it's the right thing to do (which will fall by the wayside, as it has so many times before, once it becomes unteneble).

So, not a quagmire, in my mind.
 
AndICried said:
IFalseTodd, is it true that the admin. is already talking about (effectively) pulling out of Iraq? That's quite shocking.[/QUOTE]

Not in those words, but Condi Rice, et al. have definitely begun saying that they want to "accelerate the timetable" for a handover of power. I'm drawing a conclusion from that statement, but I think it a reasonable one.