Damn

i mean, pretty much, i think? i guess the problem was that most of the "evidence" was all these physical technical things that were analyzed by mostly non-engineer type people as PROOF NOTHING CRASHED THERE or whatever plus maybe a crazy conspiracy engineer, and then all these engineers came out and were like "um none of you know what you're talking about, this is consistent physically with a crash".
 
As I said, I could be skeptical of the size of the crash considering the size of the plane that supposedly crashed. However, I cannot believe that it was a missile, a fighter jet or anything like that.