Eternity sucks?

don't mind about him...
childish / meaningles etc etc

did you read the opeth/ blackwater park review?
"Sometimes I wonder if these fanboys are actual fans of Opeth’s music, or fans of the band members just waiting to suck the proverbial cock of anything bearing the name of Opeth. "


or what did he say about in flames?
"Don’t listen to them. I mean c’mon, these are people who would lick the band member’s assholes if they ask them. Trust me, avoid Whoracle."
 
:mad: This guy needs to be punished for "Eternity" for what he wrote there...:lol: He probably just listened to it only once and more likely he was also doing something else together... :Smokin: :ill: o_O :zzz:

:lol:
 
What is really annoying with this ignorant cunt is that the review is full of offending comments. In all serious mags/sites, if the reviewer does not like the album, he makes some comments on why he didn't like it, what he thinks the band did wrong, etc. I cannot understand why does he has to use all this abusive and offending words and terms.... The guy is clearly ridiculous. His mum did not spank him enough when he was little it seems...

But what do you expect from someone that does not have the balls to sign with his real name..... Stupid fuck...
 
Usually I don´t read more than the first sentence of such reviews.
Í´m was looking for some Entwine reviews and found two in which they are compared with Anathema :err:
There are too often people making reviews of music which they don´t understand. I don´t read stuff of such people and usually also don´t talk to them about music.
 
You cannot be enlightened my friend. Can you tell me why the fuck you have to make all these offensive remarks? Do you know anybody from the band? Did they insult you or something? Anyways, I'm not gonna play the lawyer here. It's not my business. I'm just pissed...
 
No, I don't know anyone in the band. No, they haven't insulted me that I know of. Sorry you get pissed so easily.

About not posting my real name. What the hell does that matter? Is someone going to hunt me down? My email address is available for all to see. Feel free to use it.
 
Don't apologize man... It's not my problem, I told you that. Fuck, I should not interfere.... Danny or Dunc should answer not me... Sorry for calling you a cunt. I kinda lost it though...
 
fair enough, man. BTW, just so you know, a review of Serenades will be up in January. I think you will find that one is much more kind.
 
They're not serious (metal hammer, kerrand, etc.) And most important, they're not metal...
 
Well, maybe he can't rate albums
I mean that he don't like the album so he teared it into pieces (same with Opeth's BP) Pity. The art of a Good reviewer is to hear great music and bad music, not music that fits him or not. Par example: I have to admit Slayer/ Beatles/ AC DC/ Queensryche are good, but I don't like them... Fuck these are all classics, can't come up with something lesser known, but you know where I'm pointing at....
Oh and the contrary counts too, I have albums I know there are not good, but I like them because they're fun (Green Day/ Dookie and Limp Bizkit / 3 dollar bill yall$ are best examples) AND NO GORIK, SLIPKNOT IS GOOD
 
Originally posted by sol83
They're not serious (metal hammer, kerrand, etc.) And most important, they're not metal...

Which Hammer are you talking about? I only know the german one and I think that it´s not that bad. Sure there´s loads of the nu metal stuff (which for the most of bands I don´t consider as metal) but for the rest I think they at least try to cover also the other (metal) styles. And (what´s important for me) if there´s a review to do then people who are into that kind of music write it (not like a grind core freak writing a review of a gothic metal band *g*).
Rock Hard (Germany!!... The french one looks horrifying!! :s ) is sometimes ok too but they are getting old and the problem is that they didn´t develop with the music. Some of the guys seem to be stuck in the 80ties..