Fuck the state of the union...

I'll go to prison before accepting a draft call.

i've already been to prison, i've been declared "not mentally competent to perform in the armed services" so i can't get drafted, and in all honesty, if i had to choose between going back to prison and being in the military, i'd choose going back to prison
 
the only hope this country has is this man

obama.jpg


or maybe this man

opIII_nm40.jpg

then your country is certainly doomed.
 
i'm not an american citizen, and thank god i won't be for the next 10 years because immigration laws in America are so strict. I must say that if they don't finish the shit they started in iraq, the benladens are going to take over the country with iran's help an make an Afganistan 2 like country after the russians invaded it decades ago. Under Saddam alquiada had no power in there. Saddam hated them. Ben Laden=shiite, saddam=sunni. Saddam wanted to fuck them. he had no implication in 9/11, he just hated the americans (read as bush administration, daddy bush and the current one). That is because Rumsfeld himself agreed not to do anything to Iraq if they attacked kuwait, while the US had defence treaties with Kuwait.
91000 troops won't be enough unless you pilage and plunder the roman way. Theoretically to maintain an invasion you need 3:1 force ratio on your side. The only way i see the war won is to fuck up the shia and puttin the sunnis in power and fuck the democracy idea. democracy won't work with religious fundamentalists and arabs in general. some b52raids upon the shia militia strongholds or the restricted areas would be awesome. Bush should tell malaqi that if they don't grant the US acces in the restricted are they are gonna wipe out the entire restricted area no matter how many women and children are there via fuel air bombs or b52 raid. that should silence the fucker. Also the american troops should do a reign of terror kinda policy, cause with arabs being nice doesn't work. When they have info of militiamen or insurgents hidding in a civilian house don't send soldiers to arrest them, unless you need intelligence info from them, but wipe the whole house no matter how many babies are killed again. this should be a lesson for those who host insurgents.
I still believe that hitler's army was the most efficient in terms of taking control of new terrirories via a reign of terror. that is what the romans did and it worked for a thousands year. rules for killing don't fucking work.
 
america is currently recieving oil from every single country on the entire fucking planet that pumps oil. (most of it is NOT from middle east btw).
the "gasoline" that you get at "the pump" is uniquely refined, only cars/trucks/SUVs some motorboats etc use this specific chem compound, any type of aircraft (big enough to have human pasengers) uses fuel types that would break your car if you put any of them into the gas tank.
the aforementioned cars/trucks/SUVs etc could easily be relaced by vehicles that run without using any "oil" at all whatsoever. cars could run on 100% ethanol instead of this 85% ethanol/15% gasoline bullshit, there are already school buses that run on propane, cars that are 100% electrical, cars that run on water and cars where the "exhaust" is water, and all of this tech existed BEFORE the gas price spike in the 1970s.
we'd still need "oil" for vaccination/insulin shot needles, synthetic homones, and plastics such as sports equipment (insert pro athletes using steroids joke here) but we could very easily ban "gasoline". this won't ever fucking happen because of a handfull of extremely rich people don't want to part with even the tiniest fraction of their obscenely huge amounts of money.
but if it happened, if we got to a point of banning "gasoline" then the "oil" USA gets from alaska, texas, canada, mexico, south america etc would definately be sufficient enough that we could put a ban on any "oil" originating in the "middle east" or "islamic" countries, then, and only then, we could completely leave, and let them fight their "12 sided war" by themselves without american military presence
but since oil companies control america, we're never going to be capable of leaving, and because we killed innocent civilians and destroyed buildings (insttead of just killing Al-Queda members) we will never be able to leave, ever, anyway without somebody getting pissed at the fact that we left, despite the fact that the conflict is totally unresolvable
 
the reason that the "conflict" in the "middle east" is unresolveable is because of the Muslim/Islamic culture.
there's no "head of the snake" like Hitler in WWII

if North Korea attacked america, a sniper would kill Kim Jong Ill, and the war would be over
if Russia attacked America, a sniper would kill Vladimir Putin, and the war would be over
in world war 2 we killed Hitler, and the war was over

we don't have that "head of the snake" type situation when dealing with Muslim/Islamic people because every time you kill the leader of a group, the group actually becomes stronger, and the group retaliates for the death every time an "important" person is killed by an "infidel" the "conflict" is unresolvable
 
Oh boy, how much I have to say on this subject, and how much I dont want to...



Chris, wine?
 
It's hard to care for any politics when almost every politician that runs your country is a lying sack of shit. :p
 
WASHINGTON — The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday passed a nonbinding resolution that concludes "it is not in the national interest of the United States" to deepen U.S. military involvement in Iraq.

The measure, passed on a 12-9 vote, goes to the Senate floor for a vote before the full chamber, which is expected sometime next week.

Meanwhile, President George W. Bush got positive news today when the Senate Armed Services Committee approved his pick for command of U.S. forces in Iraq, Lt. Gen. David Petraeus, to go before the Senate Thursday for full approval that is expected. (Full story)

Petraeus would replace Gen. George Casey.

The resolution is the first attempt by the new Democratic-controlled Congress to check President Bush's authority to send more troops to Iraq. The measure was opposed by all the panel's Republicans except co-sponsor Sen. Chuck Hagel.

"We better be damn sure we know what we're doing, all of us, before we put 22,000 more Americans into that grinder," said Hagel, of Nebraska, before the vote.

I like this.
 
The ONLY person proposing a draft was a radical left-wing politician. While his views are justifiable (he believes that a draft would even the playing field and that the rich as well as the average Joe's children will have to serve), it's widely opposed by both sides of the table. Our politicians are lying sacks of shit, but they aren't stupid. They have realized that if they try to do this, anarchy would erupt in the US. It's just not a good idea.
 
Barak Obama, eh?

Just another creation of the parties in my opinion.