Gaia

Do you believe in the Gaia hypothesis?

  • Yes, I believe this is how the earth works

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, this is impossible

    Votes: 5 45.5%
  • I believe it to a certain extent

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • I need to know more before I decide

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11

Shpongled

Member
Aug 30, 2001
13,483
88
48
What are your thoughts on the Gaia hypothesis? Essentially, the idea that Earth is a single living organism. Here's a wiki in case you're unfamiliar with this idea:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_hypothesis

Some bullet points:

  • The hypothesis is frequently described as viewing the Earth as a single organism. Lovelock and other supporters of the idea now regard it as a scientific theory, not merely a hypothesis, since they believe it has passed predictive tests.
  • James Lovelock defined Gaia as "a complex entity involving the Earth's biosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and soil; the totality constituting a feedback or cybernetic system which seeks an optimal physical and chemical environment for life on this planet."
  • With his initial hypothesis, Lovelock claimed the existence of a global control system of surface temperature, atmosphere composition and ocean salinity. His arguments were:
    1. The global surface temperature of the Earth has remained constant, despite an increase in the energy provided by the Sun.
    2. Atmospheric composition remains constant, even though it should be unstable.
    3. Ocean salinity is constant.

He's basically implying that as the atmosphere around it changes, Earth as a single organism is able to adjust itself in order to acclimate to the change.

I'm not entirely convinced of this in a scientific fact sort of manner, but it makes sense to me. I can't say whether or not I believe it to be true, because there are so many variables to consider. That's where you guys come in. Discuss :D

One thing's certain... if Earth spontaneously combusts, we're all going down with it.

breath_gaia.jpg


gaia.jpg
 
There are certain animals that can only survive by eating other specific organisms, so if that food organism ceased to exist, so would the one that survived off of it. When something dies, it ultimately ends up back in the earth where it came from, whether it was eaten, dismembered, burned, or left in the forest to rot away into nothingness. When a living organism dies, it's material self is returned to the earth in one form or another. It's the way of all flesh (thanks Gojira!). With these things considered, imagine it on a much more grand scale that includes everything on earth and I'm inclined to believe this theory... but where would it all end? If we can prove that Earth is one living organism, is the next step to prove the entire universe is one living organism?
 
I believe it to a certain extent. To give a brief explanation of what I mean, I think of Earth as the same way as human evolution or even the universe pre-Big Bang.

I believe that the Earth may had started out as a single organism but evolved into multiple organisms combined into a single entity, kind of like multiple celled organisms. I don't know, it's kind of hard to explain when you've had as much caffeine as I have had. I suppose you couldn't really compare it with the universe pre-Big Bang when I think about it because it's my understanding that when the Big Bang occured, it was caused by a collision of two entities rather than one.
 
When something dies, it ultimately ends up back in the earth where it came from, whether it was eaten, dismembered, burned, or left in the forest to rot away into nothingness. When a living organism dies, it's material self is returned to the earth in one form or another.

Unless its launched into space!!

The national pastime of the future:
Animal Space Launching! Fun for the kids!
 
I believe it to a certain extent, like the dance monkey dance vid says "we love to separate ourself from the animals, without considering that we are animals"
IMO, even if we think we are superior, i think there is some bound with nature
 
haha good point. It's amazing how obvious this all is on mushrooms :lol:

It's funny and true. Everything seems to be inter-connected when you're frying balls (or it is connected and we just usually can't see it when sober o_O)

If the Gaia theory is true, we (humanity) are her cancer.
 
"we love to separate ourself from the animals, without considering that we are animals"
IMO, even if we think we are superior, i think there is some bound with nature
totally agreed.

I also think, all life on earth is connected with each other in some way. If something dies it will always have some effect on other species, wether that other species is going to suffer from it (because it used to eat the vanished species) or flourish (because it used to be prey for the vanished species) and that again will have an effect on another species and so on...
 
If this theory implies the earth is a self regulating system and always reacts to restore its equilibrium, then it can be fully discredited. If you regard Gaia as a biological life form or entity it can be discredited as well (the earth hasn't reproduced, and as silly as that sounds that it is an important function of biological organisms). AND.... if you are implying the earth is conscious, that is fail :lol:

Damn, I should get paid for this shit! Keep these threads comin'
 
If this theory implies the earth is a self regulating system and always reacts to restore its equilibrium, then it can be fully discredited. If you regard Gaia as a biological life form or entity it can be discredited as well (the earth hasn't reproduced, and as silly as that sounds that it is an important function of biological organisms). AND.... if you are implying the earth is conscious, that is fail :lol:
Yeah, that makes me doubt, too. Earth itself can't be an organism, but it's the entirety of all organisms.
 
How can you guys be so sure that Mars and Venus aren't the illegitimate children of Sirius and Earth?!