- Sep 13, 2002
- 831
- 6
- 18
Yeah, the same is for Bush!Paxoman said:But Tony Blair don't give a f**k, he'll have a nice bunker somewhere safe.
Does the politicians ever care about those who actually will fight in this upcoming war? Those who sacrifice their own life for their stupid politics, those who's families and friends can end up very hurt. Why get into that war if not necessary to? Bush wants a war, let him have it, it's rather unstoppable now! Yeah, Saddam is very dangerous, but the same fact is for Bush, Potin and especially the country China, all of them countires have hundreds or thousands of nuclear bombs, and they can drop them just like that, and then the consequenses is enourmos. That's what happened 11/9 -01, and it can happen again if we're not opening our eyes. Saddam is the smallest threat to this "freedom", and it doesn't even seem like Bush and him ever'd spoken.
Politics should be about freedom and peace, not to provocate a new war, a war with a hundred thousands soldiers, personally I think this upcoming war has three stupid purposes:
1. Don't ever fuck with USA, don't ever threat USA, or else you get a piece of shit yourself.
2. USA need a ambition for their tremendous military- and warbudget.
3. Bush wants his own war, just as every other president had before him, maybe he thinks he could be called a coward or something.
But, maybe Saddam is planning a war against the world, maybe he's planning to nuke the whole Earth, then the war isn't so stupid, but what if Bush wouldn't get into war with Iraq, and just leave Iraq and it's leader alone, maybe it wouldn't be another chance to fight back against Iraq when it has dropped it's bombs, and shot it shots.
16 of March, 2003.
Crusader