Cythraul said:But philosophy is for nitpickers and overanalyzers. I happen to think hairsplitting distinctions are absolutely necessary. What's worse than confused philosophical discourse resulting from a failure to acknowledge fine distinctions?
speed said:Is it? If it was, every single philosophical system would never have been created--as each has serious flaws that even the creators of such systems, realized in their days. Perhaps it is for academic nitpickers, but not the founders of such systems and philosophies.
Cythraul said:Great philosophers make mistakes and overlook things, and so do academic nitpickers trained in the art of nitpicking. They're not immune to human weakness either. Even these guys would like to hold on to their articles of faith and worldviews in the face of good reasons to reject them. That's one of the reasons why philosophers keep debating the same crap, because one group of nitpickers inevitably finds flaws in the views of their flawed nitpicking predecessors, plus it's just the nature of the subject matter.
Norsemaiden said:Just incase anyone is interested in the Viking recipe for happiness: it is the four Fs : Fire; fodder; flax, and Frigg.
Cythraul said:But philosophy is for nitpickers and overanalyzers. I happen to think hairsplitting distinctions are absolutely necessary. What's worse than confused philosophical discourse resulting from a failure to acknowledge fine distinctions?
Aarohi said:Happiness is a satisfied expectation. Its the result of the fulfilment of a desire.
Which is impossible to do practically. Yet people are 'happy'. Different definitions for different people. I'm quoting the most obvious, real-world, and common-to-majority truth and you will find out there.Hm, I dont agree with this aphorism at all. To truly be happy, one would elimanate all desires.
Aarohi said:Which is impossible to do practically. Yet people are 'happy'. Different definitions for different people. I'm quoting the most obvious, real-world, and common-to-majority truth and you will find out there.
Go ahead...Well this is a philosophy forum; thus, you quote the obvious, and I will tell you whats wrong with it, and we'll go from there.
to fulfill a desire, brings but temporary and elusive happiness; thus one feels a need to fulfill more desires for the same feeling. Now clearly such thinking turns into a never-ending process that never brings about permanent happiness, leading one to assume, that desires, will never be truly fulfilled.
I can't relate how you concluded this from what you said...Hence fulfilling a desire does not bring happiness.
Aarohi said:Go ahead...
Exactly what happens, isn't it? Temporary happiness is what everyone seeks, because, practically, no feeling (including happiness), can prevail till the time you die (a permanent feeling, quoting you).
How is Killing desires going to provide happiness? Wanting nothing from life is not happiness. Its being dead.
I can't relate how you concluded this from what you said...
speed said:Hm, I dont agree with this aphorism at all. To truly be happy, one would elimanate all desires.
speed said:And what milady, is Frigg?