Am I the only one who thinks ZoMb!M@N was joking? If this was a Wiccan or pagan forum (and I say this from experience), that comment would be high satire of the "fluffy" adherents who are interested in the religion because they've seen it on TV.
infoterror, I believe you are thinking of neo-paganism, which is not the same thing as Wicca. (The Evola article is interesting, but nowhere does it mention Wicca.)
Wicca may not *be* witchcraft, but belief in and/or practice of witchcraft is part of Wicca. Its central tenets, the Wiccan Rede and the Law of Three, refer to what constitutes acceptable use of magick.
Neo-paganism, on the other hand, does not embrace the above tenets and while its adherents may believe in and/or practice magick, they are not bound to take only action that will "harm none." Neo-paganism as I understand it is more a spiritual reverence for nature in the same vein of, say, a Christian's reverence for God, than any witches-of-Macbeth-esque chants and spell-casting. To me it is also more "valid" than Wicca.