So, I was thinking about this festival from a rather economical standpoint and I figured I would just throw this thought out there.
This year (and nothing against any of the bands, I'm talking purely monetarily and popularity-wise here) is definitly a bit lower on the spending/big draw end of things. Assuming this year sells out, I think you've got a pretty clear example of a situation where demand has exceeded supply. So, what do you do in this situation? You increase supply!
If tickets are $100, that means each 'day' is currently worth $50. Now, imagine if you added friday and made it a 3 day fest but instead of charging $150, because there is excess demand you charge $175. I don't know about the rest of you but I have a feeling pretty much everyone would be more than willing to shell out the extra money for an extra day of progpower, and considering how fast this fest always sells out, I would have to assume it would continue to sell out in this scenario - but now there are increased revenues. That means an opportunity to book even bigger bands and make the event even more of a an experience. Doing so would mean the following opportunities become available...
1. You could book 3 big headliners, or you could book 2 medium headliners and 1 HUGE headliner. For example Symphony X, Evergrey, and Angra would be an example of 3 big headliners. But you could also do Vanden Plas, Edguy, and Rhapsody <---(or insert your formerly unattainable band here). It's a nice flexibility that could provide variety year to year.
2. You have a better opportunity to please the two camps of those who want returning, familiar bands in the high slots, and those who want somthing brand new in the high slots. 6 big slots to play with yields a lot of flexibility to give us somthing old and somthing new.
3. You have a better opportunity to please the two camps of those who want prog and those who want power. 5 extra bands would lessen the current notion of a year being a 'prog' year or a 'power' year and provide the opportunity to create more of a balance for both parties.
4. A larger festival becomes a more appealing opportunity for larger bands to participate in, which means you probably end up having to pay each band less which means you can spend more to either increase the noteriety of the lower slot bands (like back at PPIII when Silent Force was 2nd on), or put it towards attaining a couple of huge headliners.
There are countless other advantages I can think of. Of course, it's Glen's show and he can do what he wants, but I would love to hear some feedback on the thought from the board!
This year (and nothing against any of the bands, I'm talking purely monetarily and popularity-wise here) is definitly a bit lower on the spending/big draw end of things. Assuming this year sells out, I think you've got a pretty clear example of a situation where demand has exceeded supply. So, what do you do in this situation? You increase supply!
If tickets are $100, that means each 'day' is currently worth $50. Now, imagine if you added friday and made it a 3 day fest but instead of charging $150, because there is excess demand you charge $175. I don't know about the rest of you but I have a feeling pretty much everyone would be more than willing to shell out the extra money for an extra day of progpower, and considering how fast this fest always sells out, I would have to assume it would continue to sell out in this scenario - but now there are increased revenues. That means an opportunity to book even bigger bands and make the event even more of a an experience. Doing so would mean the following opportunities become available...
1. You could book 3 big headliners, or you could book 2 medium headliners and 1 HUGE headliner. For example Symphony X, Evergrey, and Angra would be an example of 3 big headliners. But you could also do Vanden Plas, Edguy, and Rhapsody <---(or insert your formerly unattainable band here). It's a nice flexibility that could provide variety year to year.
2. You have a better opportunity to please the two camps of those who want returning, familiar bands in the high slots, and those who want somthing brand new in the high slots. 6 big slots to play with yields a lot of flexibility to give us somthing old and somthing new.
3. You have a better opportunity to please the two camps of those who want prog and those who want power. 5 extra bands would lessen the current notion of a year being a 'prog' year or a 'power' year and provide the opportunity to create more of a balance for both parties.
4. A larger festival becomes a more appealing opportunity for larger bands to participate in, which means you probably end up having to pay each band less which means you can spend more to either increase the noteriety of the lower slot bands (like back at PPIII when Silent Force was 2nd on), or put it towards attaining a couple of huge headliners.
There are countless other advantages I can think of. Of course, it's Glen's show and he can do what he wants, but I would love to hear some feedback on the thought from the board!