Sooooo where do you draw the line from not listening to a song because of a bad mix and not listening to a song because it's not your speakers and your room?
Can you guys not appreciate things like Robert Johnson's album because of the noise and "amateur sounding" production?
Will you never watch a band's video on youtube because it was recorded with a camera's microphone?
MANY recordings were done in less than ideal conditions production-wise and are still great songs, timeless in their own way, and even (*gasp*) pleasant to listen to. Everyone has their own standards of what they think sounds perfect and what just barely gets the music across. Yet the music WILL make its way across every time (unless its THAT clipped or what have you). It should ALWAYS be about the energy the music is trying to get across; thats what we listen to it for in the first place. The sooner people understand that not all music comes in a nice shrink-wrapped sonically crafted work with great understanding of music-theory and recording techniques, the happier you'll all be.
FFS I just watched a middle school band play an awesome instrumental rendition of Kansas - Carry On My Wayward Son... obviously they didn't know shit about good guitar tones and room acoustics or even have the best timing, but I still was left wanting more when they finished playing. For the record, I AM NOT a Kansas fan by any stretch of the imagination. Music is everywhere if you look for it... or just keep thinking the world we live in is mostly noise, I don't care really. All I know is I would go insane if I thought that way.
Are you saying you'd enjoy your music just as much if it was clipped by 12db after mastering and then listened to through a dodgy radio station filled with static and constant dropouts? No? What about if you listened to Stairway to Heaven with quantized everything, Slate drums and POD guitars? A production like that would 'ruin' the song for me.