Neith said:
Yes, although I do think that people should be able to move freely from their own land to others if they are tolerant of other beliefs and cultures, as long as they know that they may not necessarily be greeted with warmth and friendliness. (I'm shocked, we actually agree on something for a change
)
Isn't this the case already though, Neith?
Right now, we seem to accept cultural differences in our own lands, but is this the same as tolerance or harmony? No, I think not. I think part of the reason that all of the Christian vs Muslim drama has resurfaced so much in the last decade is that the water has overflowed, and that, as you said in the above quote, people are not being "greeted with warmth and friendliness".
Not only with the US's problems, but it's also surfaced here in the form of the Cronulla Riots, as well as incidents with Indonesia and Australia (the Corby case, Bali Nine, Michelle Leslie among other things).
In my opinion (I say this quite sadly given my strong support of multiculturalism), a divide has bcome very apparent, and unfortunately for people like me, it seems to be widening.
Demiurge said:
I basically agree, however, I would continue to halt the manufacturing, trafficking, and consumption of the most dangerous substances; for example, heroin and crystal meth. These will tend to elevate the crime rate. I would also ban cigarettes, which are far too addictive to be permitted, considering their detrimental effects. Legalize mdma, marijuana, lsd, etc.
Agreed, it would be wonderful if the above happens, but to do so during our development as a highly chemically dependent society would cause war and chaos itself.
A "black-black" market for banned substances would come into existence. The war on drugs for example, would then become "the war on banning manufacture of substances which are already banned", and this would basically take us back to square one ie where we are now.
All dangerously addictive substances should indeed be banned, but I do think that in a somewhat far fetched way, the damage on the worlds economy would be so great by such a move that currency and commmerce would need reinvention in order to cope.
Thus - Is righteousness and purity of life, or peace in its many forms then totally futile? Are we lighting our own funeral pyres by wishing for a non-chemically corrupt, non violent world?