you can say what you whant man.Eventho they images are are separate from eachother, you can clearly see that they arent being equal. The MT-2 for example has a lot more of the bright color (emphasis) in the 500-3000hz range, when your simulation has a lot more emphasis on the 0-200hz range and some harmonic distortion from 3kzh forward. So without hearing audioclips and judging from just those images, I would say they sound different.
you show us TSS like the best ever ts9 simulation.
so GO AND COMPARE real ts9 with TSS and then return here and tell me if mine is better.
i have done this and the fft of the TSS if fuking ridicoulus compared to the real ts9. is totally different.
if you have something like mathlab, for comparing results, you can see that my fft is 91,3% similar to real ts9's fft.
compare my simulation with tss.
i'm here not for spamming "bla bla" with you but for work.
you are here ONLY for flamming me, i don't undestand why.