Occam's Razor said:
But Nietzsche does not imply facism automatically. Since Nietzsche was an inspiration to the fascists, but not one himself - especially not in the nazi-sense.
Nietzsche was a philosopher, not a politician. His interest lay in the construction of values, not of societies. That said, he was certainly a proto-fascist in that the values he arrived at were essentially the values of the fascist state (particularly as constructed in German fascism).
Nietzschean ideas are generally manifest throughout all musical styles ("Also sprach Zarathustra", etc.)
Composed by a card carrying member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party...
and if you restrict them only to what the nazis used to meet their own ends, you don't know the diversity of Nietzsche's work (neither do I, in all honesty, but I am aware of it).
Certainly Nietzsche was more than
just a proto-fascist, but that doesn't alter the fact that Fascism was a permutation of Nietzschean idealism.
That he was not quite a a sane person makes him a suitable source for artists to draw inspiration from, so nothing new and special to metal here - and no justification of nazism in metal.
And here your own incipient totalitarianism is laid bear. Why should artists have to "justify" the inclusion of
their ideals in
their work? To satisfy your need for moral absolutism? Fuck off, asshole. Don't like it? Listen to something else. It's not a difficult concept.
I don't claim to have metal or art conform, but the question is: how far should art go?
When did we get to the point where we decide where art "should" go? You complain about fascism, but your own ideas are fundamentally totalitarian as well. You're sitting around judging art, not on the basis of its quality, but of whether it meets arbitrary standards of moral and political acceptability.
If artists are toying with fascist-imagery or -content, they want to provoke reactions for the most part and get attention.
I would agree that propagandistic art (of all stripes) primarily serves this function, but most of the better "fascist" art doesn't address "controversial" topics at all, but rather presents heroic idealism and the warrior ethos as an alternative to the stunted mundanity of the Judeo-Christian/liberal worldview that predominates in our societies. You're proposing that we judge artists, not on the virtues of their work, but on the content of their beliefs, something that cannot be honestly presented as anything
but totalitarian.
What I meant was that you insult the people affected by the holocaust with this provocation already,
How do I insult anyone by condemning NSBM as propaganda? Your complaint seems to be that I haven't condemned it for the right reasons, but fuck that. This is art, it isn't killing anyone. I'm not going to condemn people for thinking the "wrong" things when there are more concrete, less emotive reasons for dismissing their work. Your actions make it clear that you aren't interested in evaluating art on its own terms or even in art primarily for its own sake. Your interest is in seeking ideological conformity and you act like spoiled child throwing a tantrum when you don't get it.
You reserve metal for the white non-Jewish boys
Point to where I've done anything of the sort. You can't because I haven't. You medaciously accuse me of advancing arguments that I haven't made. Why? One can only presume this is the result of your complete inability to address the arguments I
have made to your satisfaction. But do keep amusing me with your childishness, jr.
just as some of your predecessors have stolen the blues
And blacks stole the blues from the British folk music they encountered in the American South. Do you actually have a point here?
So there's always going to be a certain incipient fascism implied by metal.
Your opinion, but what band sounds like Skyclad, since they are so unoriginal to you?
There literally dozens of American and European speed metal (you would call them "thrash", I suppose) bands with very similar sounds, the only unique element is the violin. But that's a gimmick of the purest sort.
He was indeed able to create something out of hardly anything, yet the success of these compositional attempts is equaly meagre, at least to me.
Yes, but we've already established that you are a gullible, tasteless idiot overly impressed with superficial crap like "technicality," so I can safely dismiss your opinion as irrelevant.
Anyway - in pointing to Skyclad, I did not refer to their music primarily, but to the lyrics, that are far superior to the emo-esoteric-Nordic humbug you refer to.
Lefty propaganda + poorly executed attempts at humor will never match the emotional power and intellectual depth of "Det som engang var" or any other
serious lyrical content. It's not my fault that you mistake lyrics so self-explanatory and lacking in literary device that even an idiot like you can "get" them for actually being deep. Walkyier is "deep" in the same way that bloggers are "deep," which is to say, not at all. Political sloganeering will never substitute for actually saying something.
What else motivates the urge to put Jews into concentration camps other than that?
Who is seriously urging that? Oh, nevermind, it's just you talking out your ass again.